Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-04029

#1

May 26, 2026

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Sergio Albarran, Markwayne Mullien, Rodney S. Scott, Ryan L Spradlin by Carlos Eduardo Duque Jaramillo. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-13373246) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Supplement)(Romero, Lori) (Entered: 05/26/2026)

#2

May 26, 2026

MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Carlos Eduardo Duque Jaramillo. (Attachments: # 1 Supplement)(Romero, Lori) (Entered: 05/26/2026)

#3

May 27, 2026

IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS (Deputy Clerk ED) (Entered: 05/27/2026)

#4

May 27, 2026

DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Sean Davis, GOVT for Sergio Albarran,Sean Davis, GOVT for Markwayne Mullin,Sean Davis, GOVT for Rodney S. Scott,Sean Davis, GOVT for Ryan L Spradlin,Sean Davis, GOVT for Warden of Mesa Verde Detention Facility (Davis, Sean) (Entered: 05/27/2026)

#5

May 27, 2026

EO: The court has received and reviewed Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, ECF No. 1, and Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, ECF No. 2 . Pending the court'sdecision on the Petition, and unless and until the court orders otherwise, the court ORDERS that Respondents shall not transfer Petitioner out of this District. See F.T.C. v.Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (noting court's "express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction"). Because the Motion, ECF No. 2, seeks only an order barring Respondents from transferring Petitioner--which is effectively the same relief provided by this status quo order--the Motion is DENIED AS MOOT. The issues raised in the Petition appear to mirror those previously addressed by other district judges in many prior cases. See Germinal v. Warden of the Mesa Verde Detention Facility, 1:26-cv-03776-MWJS; Fernandes Lima v. Warden, No. 1:26-cv-03651-MWJS, A.J.S.M.P. v. Mullin, No. 1:26-cv-03163-MWJS; De Leon Sales v. Warden, California City Corr. Ctr.,No. 1:26-cv-02821-MWJS. Given the substantial percolation of these issues, the court intends to rule directly on the Petition. See 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."). On or before May 28, 2026, Respondents are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that render it distinguishable from prior orders such as the ones listed above and justify denying the Petition, or indicate this matter is not substantively distinguishable. Petitioner may file a reply on or before May 29, 2026. This matter is not set for a hearing though the court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary. IT IS SO ORDERED. (JUDGE MICAH W. J. SMITH) (ab) (Entered: 05/27/2026)

May 27, 2026

Minute Order AND Order on Motion for TRO AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings

#10

May 29, 2026

Order

#11

May 29, 2026

Judgment AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case