Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-03965

#1

May 22, 2026

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Todd Blanche, Christopher Chestnut, Orestes Cruz, Markwayne Mullin, David Venturella by Daniela Yissel Palma Ferrera. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-13365275) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Zottola, Dana) (Entered: 05/22/2026)

#2

May 26, 2026

IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS (Deputy Clerk ED) (Entered: 05/26/2026)

#3

May 26, 2026

DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Nisreen Fakhouri Assaf for Todd Blanche,Nisreen Fakhouri Assaf for Christopher Chestnut,Nisreen Fakhouri Assaf for Orestes Cruz,Nisreen Fakhouri Assaf for Markwayne Mullin,Nisreen Fakhouri Assaf for David Venturella (Assaf, Nisreen) (Entered: 05/26/2026)

#4

May 27, 2026

DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Angel Fleming for Respondents. Attorney Nisreen Fakhouri Assaf terminated. (Fleming, Angel) Modified on 6/1/2026 (HAH). (Entered: 05/27/2026)

#5

May 27, 2026

Temporary Restraining Order

#6

May 28, 2026

MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy for Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 05/28/2026. Petitioner, Daniela Yissel Palma Ferrera (A# 221-095-998), a self-represented immigration detainee, filed a 1 petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The court has previously addressed the legal issues raised by Counts Two and Four of the petition. Respondents are directed to file a response within 14 days from the date of this order, which shall substantively address whether there are any factual or legal issues that materially distinguish it from the court's prior orders in Labrador-Prato v. Noem, No. 1:25-cv-1598 DC SCR (HC), ___ F. Supp. 3d ____, 2025 WL 3458802 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2025), Selis Tinoco v. Noem, No. 1:25-cv-1762 DC JDP (HC), ___ F. Supp. 3d ____, 2025 WL 3567862 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2025), D.L.C. v. Wofford, No. 1:25-cv-1996 DC JDP (HC), 2026 WL 25511 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2026), Orellana Gonzalez v. Cerna, No. 1:26-cv-1344 DC JDP (HC), 2026 WL 604193 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2026), Singh v. Noem, No. 1:26-cv-1150 DC JDP (HC), 2026 WL 585512 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 2, 2026), Alvarez Maciel v. Noem, No. 1:26-cv-01318-DC-CKD, 2026 WL 496948 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2026), Barajas Ortiz v. Chestnut, No. 1:26-cv-01167-DC-SCR, 2026 WL 508419 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2026), Zuniga Cruz v. Noem, No. 1:26-cv-01818-DC-EFB, 2026 WL 890471 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2026) and other similar cases previously decided by this court, or otherwise indicate that the matter is not substantively distinguishable. The response shall include petitioner's Form I-213 for each immigration encounter, any orders of release or detention, any custody warrants, notices, or decisions, and if respondents dispute any factual representations in the operative petition, any and all documents necessary to support their view of the facts. Petitioner's reply, if any, is due within 7 days of being served a copy of the respondents' response. [If no prior no transfer order: Respondents shall NOT TRANSFER petitioner outside of this judicial district, pending further order of the court. See 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) (establishing the All Writs Act which empowers the federal courts to "issue all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of their respective jurisdictions...."); see also F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (emphasizing that federal courts have the power to "to preserve the court's jurisdiction or maintain the status quo by injunction pending review of an agency's action").] (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk JAA) (Entered: 05/28/2026)

#7

May 28, 2026

MINUTE ORDER issued by the Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 5/28/2026: The court has reviewed Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 5 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. The court has previously addressed the legal issues raised by Count Two of the Petition. See e.g., Selis Tinoco v. Noem, 1:25-cv-01762-DC-JDP, 2025 WL 3567862 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2025), Labrador-Prato v. Noem, 1:25-cv-01598-DC-SCR, 2025 WL 3458802 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2025), and D.L.C. v. Wofford, 1:25-cv-01996-DC-JDP, 2026 WL 25511 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2026). The court is contemplating ruling directly on the 1 Petition, with the understanding that the court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); A.R. v. Chestnut, No. 1:26-cv-00551-KES-SAB, 2026 WL 227112, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2026) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). Respondents shall file an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to the 5 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by 12:00 PM on 6/1/2026. In their response, Respondents shall substantively address whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that materially distinguish it from the court's prior orders listed above. Petitioner may file a Reply by 6/16/2026. Both parties should address whether they oppose the court ruling directly on the Petition, albeit as to Count Two only, to the extent a ruling on that Count entitles Petitioner to the relief sought in the Petition. The matter is not set for a hearing though the court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS) (Entered: 05/28/2026)

May 28, 2026

Minute Order

May 28, 2026

Minute Order AND ~Util - Set Motion and F&R Deadlines/Hearings

#8

Jun 01, 2026

Opposition to Motion

#9

Jun 01, 2026

REPLY by Daniela Yissel Palma Ferrera re 8 Opposition to Motion. (Zottola, Dana) (Entered: 06/01/2026)

#10

Jun 09, 2026

Order AND Order on Motion for TRO AND Order on Motion to Dismiss AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case

#11

Jun 09, 2026

Judgment