Active
Case Information
Filed: May 24, 2026
Assigned to:
F. Dennis Saylor IV
Referred to:
—
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Active
Last Activity:
July 09, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
May 24, 2026
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number AMADC-11765307 Fee status: Filing Fee paid., filed by Cesar Escobar Hernandez. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Category Form)(Keefe, Joanna) (Entered: 05/24/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241
#2
May 26, 2026
ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Patti B. Saris assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Jessica D. Hedges. (CAM) (Entered: 05/26/2026)
#3
May 26, 2026
District Judge Patti B. Saris: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. Pursuant to Local Rule 40.1(j)(1), I hereby direct the Clerk forthwith to randomly reassign the case to another District Judge.(LP) (Entered: 05/26/2026)
#4
May 26, 2026
ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Reassignment. District Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV added. District Judge Patti B. Saris no longer assigned to case. (CAM) (Entered: 05/26/2026)
#5
May 26, 2026
General Order 19-02
Main Document:
General Order 19-02
#6
May 26, 2026
Service Order-2241 Petition
Main Document:
Service Order-2241 Petition
May 26, 2026
Notice of Case Assignment
May 26, 2026
Notice of Reassignment
May 26, 2026
Order
#7
Jun 02, 2026
Notice of Appearance
Main Document:
Notice of Appearance
#8
Jun 02, 2026
Answer/Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241
Main Document:
Answer/Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241
#10
Jun 15, 2026
Alter Judgment
Main Document:
Alter Judgment
#11
Jun 17, 2026
District Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV ELECTRONIC ORDER entered: Petitioner has filed a Motion to Alter Judgment, Dkt. No. 10, contending that although he received a bond hearing as required by this Court’s order of June 3, 2026, Dkt. No. 9, it was not constitutionally adequate for several reasons. The government is hereby ordered to respond to this contention within seven days—that is, by June 24, 2026. The government should address, among other issues, whether petitioner is required to exhaust his administrative remedies, including appeal of the IJ’s bond determination to the BIA, before the Court may entertain this motion.(MAC) (Entered: 06/17/2026)
Jun 17, 2026
Order
#12
Jun 24, 2026
Response to Motion
Main Document:
Response to Motion
#13
Jul 09, 2026
Exhibit
Main Document:
Exhibit
Parties
Party
Party
Party
Party
Attorney