District of Massachusetts • 1:26-cv-12320

#1

May 21, 2026

Emergency PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number AMADC-11760467 Fee status: Filing Fee paid., filed by Walisson De Meira Rodrigues. (Attachments: # 1 Category Form, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet, # 3 Exhibit 1 - EOIR Hearing Information)(Cerretani, Gabriela) (Entered: 05/21/2026)

#2

May 21, 2026

ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Patti B. Saris assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley. (CAM) (Entered: 05/21/2026)

#3

May 21, 2026

General Order 19-02, dated June 1, 2019 regarding Public Access to Immigration Cases Restricted by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c). (CGK) (Entered: 05/21/2026)

#4

May 21, 2026

District Judge Patti B. Saris: ORDER entered. ORDER Concerning Service of Petition and Stay of Transfer or Removal. The answer or responsive pleading is due no later than May 27, 2026(CGK) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/21/2026: # 1 Appendix) (CGK). (Entered: 05/21/2026)

#5

May 21, 2026

Copy re 4 Service Order, 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), mailed to Respondents and courtesy copy emailed to Duty AUSA on 5/21/2026. (CGK) (Entered: 05/21/2026)

May 21, 2026

Notice of Case Assignment

May 21, 2026

Copy Mailed

#6

May 27, 2026

Answer/Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241

#7

May 27, 2026

District Judge Patti B. Saris: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241).Petitioner Walisson De Meira Rodrigues ("Petitioner") has filed a habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 to challenge his immigration detention without a bond hearing. The government concedes "that the legal issues presented in this [p]etition are similar to those addressed by this Court in <u.Guerrero Orellana v. Moniz" and that if "the Court follow[s] its reasoning in Guerrero Orellana, it would reach the same result here." Dkt. 6 at 1.Given this concession and for the reasons stated in Guerrero Orellana, the Court concludes that Petitioner is entitled to a bond hearing in immigration court. See Guerrero Orellana v. Moniz, 802 F. Supp. 3d 297, 306-12 (D. Mass. 2025), appeal filed, No. 25-2152 (1st Cir. Dec. 2, 2025); Guerrero Orellana v. Moniz, 813 F. Supp. 3d 185, 193-95 (D. Mass. 2025), appeal filed, No. 26-1094 (1st Cir. Jan. 22, 2026). Accordingly, the Court ALLOWS the habeas petition (Dkt. 1 ) and ORDERS that the government release Petitioner unless he is provided with a bond hearing that complies with the standards outlined in Hernandez-Lara v. Lyons, 10 F.4th 19 (1st Cir. 2021), within seven business days of the date of this order. No later than fourteen days from the date of this order, the government shall file a status report confirming that Petitioner has received a bond hearing (or has been released in lieu of a bond hearing) and stating the outcome of the bond hearing.(CGK) (Entered: 05/27/2026)

#8

May 27, 2026

SET DEADLINES as to: Status Report due by 6/10/2026.(CGK) (Entered: 05/27/2026)

May 27, 2026

Order

#9

Jun 02, 2026

Status Report

#10

Jun 09, 2026

Judgment