District of Connecticut • 3:26-cv-00798

Heitor v. DHS ICE

Active

Case Information

Filed: May 21, 2026
Assigned to: Stefan R. Underhill
Referred to:
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Active
Last Activity: May 22, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
May 21, 2026
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Eriton Joabis Heitor.(ag) (Entered: 05/21/2026)
Main Document: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#3
May 21, 2026
Standing Protective Order Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 5/21/2026. (to) (Entered: 05/22/2026)
Main Document: Standing Protective Order (Intake)
#4
May 21, 2026
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 5/21/2026. (to) (Entered: 05/22/2026)
Main Document: Electronic Filing Order
#5
May 21, 2026
Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction to conduct all proceedings in this civil action (including presiding over a jury or non-jury trial) and to order the entry of final judgment. (to) (Entered: 05/22/2026)
Main Document: Notice of Option to Consent to MJ Jurisdiction (intake)
#6
May 21, 2026
Notice to Counsel and Litigants Regarding AI-Assisted Research: Attorneys and pro se litigants alike should exercise great caution in submitting any AI-generated language in filings before the Court. Use of AI without verification of the accuracy of the information it generates like any other shoddy research method from other sources or tools implicates Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, the central purpose of which is to deter baseless filings in district court and thus to streamline the administration and procedure of the federal courts. Rule 11 applies fully to actions filed by pro se litigants.Therefore, all parties are on notice that the Court has a no-tolerance policy for any briefing (AI-assisted or not) that hallucinates legal propositions or otherwise severely misstates the law. Such filings will often result in sanctions absent reasonable excuse. See generally Willis v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n et al, No. 3:25-CV-516-BN, 2025 WL 1408897 (N.D. Tex. May 15, 2025). Signed by Clerk on 5/21/2026. (to) (Entered: 05/22/2026)
May 21, 2026
Filing Fee received from Mya Gasiorek $ 5.00, receipt number 174102 and Hfd 23288 Signed by Clerk on 5/21/2026.(ag) Modified to add final receipt number on 5/22/2026 (ag).
May 21, 2026
NEW Case Assignment
May 21, 2026
CASE ASSIGNMENT: District Judge Stefan R. Underhill assigned to the case. If the District Judge issues an Order of Referral to a Magistrate Judge for any matter other than settlement, the matter will be referred to Magistrate Judge Robert A. Richardson. (mr)
May 21, 2026
Filing Fee Received
#2
May 22, 2026
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND PROHIBITING TRANSFER OR REMOVAL. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 5/22/2026. (RC) (Entered: 05/22/2026)
Main Document: Order to Show Cause
#7
May 22, 2026
Notice of Appearance
Main Document: Notice of Appearance
#8
May 22, 2026
Clarification
Main Document: Clarification
May 22, 2026
Notice re: AI-Assisted Research
May 22, 2026
Order on Motion for Clarification