Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-03879

(HC) Stacey Hernandez v. Warden, California City Correctional Center

Completed

Case Information

Filed: May 20, 2026
Assigned to: Dale Alan Drozd
Referred to: Chi Soo Kim
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 8:1105(a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Completed: May 29, 2026
Last Activity: June 04, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
May 20, 2026
PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Warden, California City Correctional Center by Hellmunth Andres Stacey Hernandez. [$5 filing fee received on 05/20/2026. Receipt to be docketed on 05/21/2026] (Deputy Clerk AKP) (Entered: 05/21/2026)
Main Document: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
May 20, 2026
MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Hellmunth Andres Stacey Hernandez. (Deputy Clerk AKP) (Entered: 05/21/2026)
Main Document: Temporary Restraining Order
#3
May 21, 2026
IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS (Deputy Clerk AKP) (Entered: 05/21/2026)
Main Document: Immigration New Case Documents
#4
May 21, 2026
DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Nisreen Fakhouri Assaf for Warden, California City Correctional Center (Assaf, Nisreen) (Entered: 05/21/2026)
Main Document: DESIGNATION
#5
May 21, 2026
MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/21/2026: Pending the issuance of the court's order resolving the pending 2 motion for temporary restraining order, and unless and until the court orders otherwise, the court ORDERS that respondents shall not take any action to remove petitioner from the United States or to move petitioner out of the Eastern District of California. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (acknowledging the court's express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction). Given the exigent circumstances present, the court finds that this order is warranted to maintain the status quo pending its forthcoming order resolving petitioner's pending 2 motion for temporary restraining order. Further, the court has conducted a preliminary review of the pending motion and petition for writ of habeas corpus and observes that this case may involve core issues that the undersigned has previously addressed in this context. Accordingly, the parties are advised that if the court concludes that petitioner is entitled to the relief that is requested in the pending motion, then the court will also rule on the merits of the underlying petition. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); Dzhabrailov v. Decker, No. 20-cv-03118-PMH, 2020 WL 2731966 (S.D.N.Y. May 26, 2020) (considering the merits of the habeas petition and motion for preliminary injunction simultaneously). Counsel for respondents shall promptly enter Notices of Appearance. Respondents shall file a written opposition to the pending 2 motion for temporary restraining order by 5:00 PM on Friday, 5/22/2026. In that opposition, respondents shall substantively address whether any provision of law or fact in this case would distinguish it from this court's decisions in Ayala Cajina v. Wofford, No. 1:25-cv-01566-DAD-AC (HC), 2025 WL 3251083 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 21, 2025); Perez v. Albarran, No. 1:25-cv-01540-DAD-CSK (HC), 2025 WL 3187578 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2025); Chavarria v. Chestnut, No. 1:25-cv-01755-DAD-AC (E.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2025); Yang v. Warden, California City Correctional Center, et al., No. 2:26-cv-00832-DAD-DMC, 2026 WL 765027 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2026); Quichimbo-Jimenez v. Warden, California City Correctional Center, 2:26-cv-00739-DAD-EFB (HC), 2026 WL 679378 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 10, 2026); Cardenas v. Chestnut, et al., No. 1:26-cv-02073-DAD-SCR (HC), 2026 WL 785871 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2026); J.P.C. v. Chestnut, et al., 1:26-cv-02108-DAD-JDP, 2026 WL 788129 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2026), and other similar cases previously decided by this court, or otherwise indicate that the matter is not substantively distinguishable. The court will construe failure to distinguish the above cited cases as a concession that the cases are not substantively distinguishable. If respondents oppose this court ruling on the underlying petition, then respondents are DIRECTED to indicate so and provide substantive reasons in support thereof in their opposition. (Deputy Clerk PAB) (Entered: 05/21/2026)
May 21, 2026
Service by Mail
May 21, 2026
RECEIPT number 200019131 for $5.00 for filing fee from Hellmunth Andres Stacey Hernandez. (Deputy Clerk VLK)
May 21, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 3 Immigration New Case Documents served on Hellmunth Andres Stacey Hernandez. (Deputy Clerk AKP)
May 21, 2026
Minute Order
May 21, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 5 Minute Order served on Hellmunth Andres Stacey Hernandez. (Deputy Clerk PAB)
#6
May 22, 2026
ANSWER (Response) to 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and OPPOSITION to 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by Warden, California City Correctional Center. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2) (Assaf, Nisreen) Modified on 5/29/2026 (KS). (Entered: 05/22/2026)
Main Document: ANSWER
#7
May 29, 2026
Order AND Order on Motion for TRO AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case
Main Document: Order AND Order on Motion for TRO AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case
#8
May 29, 2026
Judgment
Main Document: Judgment
May 29, 2026
Service by Mail
May 29, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 7 Order and 8 Judgment served on Hellmunth Andres Stacey Hernandez. (Deputy Clerk KS)
Jun 04, 2026
MAIL RETURNED as Undeliverable, Not deliverable as addressed, Unable to Forward 3 Immigration New Case Documents sent to Hellmunth Andres Stacey Hernandez. (Deputy Clerk AKP)

Parties

(HC) Stacey Hernandez
Party
Warden, California City Correctional Center
Party