Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-03876

#1

May 20, 2026

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Warden, California City Correctional Center by Rudimildo Mendez Roblero. [$5 filing fee received on 05/20/2026. Receipt to be docketed on 05/21/2026] (Deputy Clerk AKP) (Entered: 05/21/2026)

#2

May 20, 2026

MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Rudimildo Mendez Roblero. (Deputy Clerk AKP) (Entered: 05/21/2026)

#3

May 21, 2026

IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS (Deputy Clerk AKP) (Entered: 05/21/2026)

#4

May 21, 2026

DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Nisreen Fakhouri Assaf for Warden, California City Correctional Center (Assaf, Nisreen) (Entered: 05/21/2026)

May 21, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 3 Immigration New Case Documents served on Rudimildo Mendez Roblero. (Deputy Clerk AKP)

May 21, 2026

RECEIPT number 200019128 for $5.00 for filing fee from Rudimildo Mendez Roblero. (Deputy Clerk VLK)

May 21, 2026

Service by Mail

#5

May 22, 2026

Notice of Related Case

#6

May 26, 2026

MINUTE ORDERORDER (Text Only Entry). The Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and the ex parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order. ECF Nos. 1, 2. Ruling on the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and the Application and Motion for Temporary Restraining Order is reserved at this time. Respondents shall file any opposition to the Petition and the application for TRO by May 27, 2026. Any response must include Petitioner's (A-File # 216398930) full and complete Form I-213, any orders of release or detention, any custody warrants or notices, and any other portions of Petitioner's A-File relevant to the determination of the issues presented in the Petition, including available documentation related to any asserted violations of release conditions. Failure to timely respond shall be construed as a non-opposition. See L.R. 230(c). Respondent is directed to indicate on or before the filing deadline (1) whether they are requesting a hearing; and (2) whether they request additional briefing on the merits of the petition. Respondent is further directed to address the impact of Petitioner's prior related cases on this Petition. Depending on the content of the filings, the Court may set a hearing or may rule on the papers. In the meantime, pending a ruling on the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the Court orders that Respondents shall not transfer Petitioner out of this District. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 608 (1966) (noting the court's "express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction."). Signed by Visiting Judge Rebecca L Pennell on 5/26/2026: (Text Only Entry). (Deputy Clerk LLH) (Entered: 05/26/2026)

#7

May 26, 2026

MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry). The deadline for filing of Respondents' opposition to the Petition and application for TRO is extended to May 29, 2026. Signed by Visiting Judge Rebecca L Pennell on 5/26/2026: (Text Only Entry). (Deputy Clerk LLH) (Entered: 05/26/2026)

May 26, 2026

Minute Order

#8

May 27, 2026

Order Reassigning Case

May 27, 2026

Service by Mail

May 27, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 8 Order served on Rudimildo Mendez Roblero. (Deputy Clerk OML)

#9

May 28, 2026

Dismiss

#10

Jun 03, 2026

Opposition to Motion

#11

Jun 03, 2026

STATUS REPORT by Warden, California City Correctional Center. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Yu, Jonathan) (Entered: 06/03/2026)

#12

Jun 05, 2026

Opposition to Motion

#13

Jun 08, 2026

MEMORANDUM of POINTS and AUTHORITIES in support 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Rudimildo Mendez Roblero. (Deputy Clerk VLC) Modified on 6/18/2026 (HAH). (Entered: 06/09/2026)

#14

Jun 10, 2026

MINUTE ORDER issued on 6/10/2026 by the Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins: In Petitioner's 2 Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order, Petitioner contends that the bond hearing provided to him on 3/23/2026 pursuant to the court's order in Mendez Roblero v. Bondi, No. 1:26-cv-01550-DC-CSK, was insufficient because the Immigration Judge did not adequately consider all factors required under Matter of R-A-V-P, 27 I&N Dec. 803 (BIA 2020) in determining that Petitioner presented a flight risk. To the extent Petitioner argues that the evidence submitted by Respondents at Petitioner's bond hearing was insufficient to warrant his continued detention, Petitioner must appeal that determination to the Board of Immigration Appeals before pursuing habeas relief. Loba L.M. v. Andrews, No. 1:25-cv-00611-JLT-SAB, 2026 WL 710307, at *8 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2026) ("Petitioner challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the immigration judge's bond determination rather than the constitutionality of the process by which that determination was reached... Complaints about the conclusion the IJ reached must be presented through the normal immigration appeal process."). Indeed, Petitioner acknowledges that he timely filed an appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals, and that appeal remains pending. Thus, Petitioner did not exhaust his administrative remedies before filing his 1 Habeas Petition, and therefore Petitioner has not demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits of his claim that his continued detention violates his constitutional or statutory rights and his 2 Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order is DENIED. This matter is REFERRED to the assigned Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS) (Entered: 06/10/2026)

Jun 10, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: Minute Order, filed at Doc. No. 14, served on Rudimildo Mendez Roblero. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS)

Jun 10, 2026

Service by Mail

Jun 10, 2026

Minute Order AND Order on Motion for TRO AND ~Util - 1 Terminate Deadlines and Hearings

#15

Jul 10, 2026

Miscellaneous Relief