District of Massachusetts • 1:25-cv-13416

#1

Nov 15, 2025

First PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number AMADC-11360547 Fee status: Filing Fee paid., filed by ghazanfar ibrahim. (Attachments: # 1 Category Form Category Form, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Even, Alexandra) (Entered: 11/15/2025)

#2

Nov 15, 2025

Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ORDER entered. EMERGENCY ORDER CONCERNING STAY OF TRANSFER OR REMOVAL(CM) (Entered: 11/15/2025)

#3

Nov 17, 2025

ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Richard G. Stearns assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (NMC) (Entered: 11/17/2025)

#4

Nov 17, 2025

Order

#5

Nov 17, 2025

Copy re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) and 4 Order mailed to Patricia Hyde, Todd M Lyons, Kristi L. Noem, Antone Moniz, David Wesling, Pamela Bondi and Donald J. Trump on 11/17/2025. (JAM) (Entered: 11/17/2025)

Nov 17, 2025

Notice of Case Assignment

Nov 17, 2025

Copy Mailed

#6

Nov 21, 2025

Notice of Appearance

#7

Nov 26, 2025

Extension of Time to File Response/Reply

#8

Dec 01, 2025

Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 7 Motion for Extension of Time until December 1, 2025, to File Response/Reply to the habeas petition. (MZ) (Entered: 12/01/2025)

#9

Dec 01, 2025

Answer/Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254

Dec 01, 2025

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply

#10

Dec 03, 2025

Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. Respondents declare under oath that petitioner is subject to a final order of removal. Because petitioner's detention is seemingly mandated by subject by 8 U.S.C. § 1231(a)(2) where, as here, the order of removal is less than ninety days old, and because 8 U.S.C. § 1252(g) precludes a district court from entering a stay of removal while an individual seeks alternative forms of immigration relief, petitioner is ordered to show cause by December 12, 2025, why this case should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.(RGS, law3) (Entered: 12/03/2025)

Dec 03, 2025

Order

#11

Dec 12, 2025

Notice of Appearance

#12

Dec 15, 2025

Notice of Appearance

#13

Dec 15, 2025

Response - not related to a motion

#14

Dec 16, 2025

Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. Although the court has sympathy for petitioner, it is undisputed that he is subject to a final order of removal less than ninety days old. While the Calderon-Jimenez settlement may provide a process for petitioner to file a joint motion to reopen and terminate that order, petitioner does not indicate that he has completed the process, such that his order of removal is no longer final. His detention is thus governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1231(a)(2)(A), and the court lacks discretion to order his release.(To the extent petitioner contends that ICE violated its substantive obligations under the Calderon-Jimenez settlement agreement by taking enforcement action against him, his avenue of relief is a motion to enforce filed with the Judge entering the settlement, consistent with Section VI of the agreement.)(RGS, law3) (Entered: 12/16/2025)

#15

Dec 16, 2025

Order Dismissing Case

Dec 16, 2025

Order