Active
Case Information
Filed: May 19, 2026
Assigned to:
Shane Kato Crews
Referred to:
—
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Active
Last Activity:
May 21, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
May 19, 2026
APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241 (Filing fee $ 5, Receipt Number ACODC-11024037)Attorney Laura L. Lichter added to party Reineir Rodriguez Rodriguez(pty:pet), filed by Reineir Rodriguez Rodriguez. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lichter, Laura) (Entered: 05/19/2026)
Main Document:
APPLICATION
#2
May 19, 2026
NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Laura L. Lichter on behalf of Reineir Rodriguez Rodriguez (Lichter, Laura) (Entered: 05/19/2026)
Main Document:
NOTICE
#3
May 19, 2026
Case assigned to Judge S. Kato Crews and drawn to Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella. Text Only Entry. (jberr, ) (Entered: 05/20/2026)
#4
May 20, 2026
Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (jberr, ) (Entered: 05/20/2026)
Main Document:
Magistrate
#5
May 20, 2026
NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Mark Robert Barr on behalf of Reineir Rodriguez RodriguezAttorney Mark Robert Barr added to party Reineir Rodriguez Rodriguez(pty:pet) (Barr, Mark) (Entered: 05/20/2026)
Main Document:
NOTICE
#6
May 21, 2026
ORDER Upon review of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 1, it is ORDERED that Petitioner shall SERVE Respondents, see F.R.C.P. 4(i)(1) & (2), with a copy of the Petition and accompanying papers, along with a copy of this Order, by e-mail and by overnight certified mail, on or before May 28, 2026. Petitioner shall promptly file proof of such service on the docket, and counsel for Respondents shall promptly enter their notices of appearance. Based upon a preliminary review of the Petition, the facts of this case appear to be controlled by the Courts analysis in Diallo v. Baltazar, No. 1:25-cv-3548-SKC, 2026 WL 237296 (D. Colo. Jan. 29, 2026). Consequently, within five days of service, Respondents shall RESPOND to the Petition and SHOW CAUSE why it should not be granted. In their Response, Respondents must first address whether the present case differs factually or legally from Diallo in any material respect, and if so, shall specify the material differences. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Pursuant to the All Writs Act, and in order to preserve the Court's jurisdiction, Respondents SHALL NOT REMOVE Petitioner from the District of Colorado or the United States unless or until this Court or the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit vacates this Order. SO ORDERED by Judge S. Kato Crews on 5/21/2026.Text Only Entry (skclc4) (Entered: 05/21/2026)
May 21, 2026
Order
Parties
Party
Party
Party
Party
Attorney
Attorney
Firm