Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-03805

(HC) Sachin v. Blanche

Active

Case Information

Filed: May 18, 2026
Assigned to: Kirk E. Sherriff
Referred to: Christopher D. Baker
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 8:1105(a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Active
Last Activity: May 22, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
May 18, 2026
PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against All Defendants by Sachin Sachin. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-13338030) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Virdi, Nareshwar) (Entered: 05/18/2026)
Main Document: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
May 18, 2026
MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Sachin Sachin. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D)(Virdi, Nareshwar) (Entered: 05/18/2026)
Main Document: Temporary Restraining Order
#3
May 18, 2026
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Sachin Sachin. (Virdi, Nareshwar) (Entered: 05/18/2026)
Main Document: CIVIL
#4
May 18, 2026
IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS (Deputy Clerk MCF) (Entered: 05/18/2026)
Main Document: Immigration New Case Documents
#5
May 18, 2026
CERTIFICATE / PROOF of SERVICE by Sachin Sachin re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, 3 Civil Cover Sheet, 2 MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, 4 Immigration New Case Documents. (Virdi, Nareshwar) (Entered: 05/18/2026)
Main Document: Certificate / Proof of Service
#6
May 18, 2026
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 05/18/2026)
Main Document: CONSENT/DECLINE
#7
May 18, 2026
MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Kirk E. Sherriff on 5/18/2026: (Text Only Entry). The Court has reviewed the 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus and 2 motion for temporary restraining order. The Court has previously addressed the legal issues raised by claim three of the 1 petition. See e.g., Luis Alberto R.C. v. Murray, 817 F. Supp. 3d 917 (E.D. Cal. 2025); Elmer Joel M. C. v. Wofford, No. 1:25-CV-01622-KES-CDB (HC), 2025 WL 3501200 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2025); W.V.S.M. v. Wofford, No. 1:25-CV-01489-KES-HBK (HC), 2025 WL 3236521 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 19, 2025); Bilal A. v. Wofford, No. 1:25-CV-01715-KES-HBK (HC), 2025 WL 3648366 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 16, 2025); Marina V.N. v. Robbins, No. 1:25-CV-01845-KES-SKO (HC), 2025 WL 3701960 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 21, 2025). The Court intends to rule directly on the 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus, with the understanding that the Court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the 2 motion for temporary restraining order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); Dzhabrailov v. Decker, No. 20-CV-3118 (PMH), 2020 WL 2731966, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. May 26, 2020) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). On or before May 20, 2026, respondents are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that distinguish it from the Court's prior orders in Luis Alberto R.C. v. Murray, Elmer Joel M. C. v. Wofford, W.V.S.M. v. Wofford, Bilal A. v. Wofford, and Marina V.N. v. Robbins and justify denying the petition, or indicate the matter is not substantively distinguishable. By May 18, 2026, to the extent not already accomplished, petitioner's counsel is directed: (1) to serve respondents with a copy of the petition, the motion for temporary restraining order, the accompanying papers, and a copy of this Order, by e-mail to all appropriate recipients including the United States Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of California, with a copy to usacae.ecf2241-imm@usdoj.gov, and by overnight mail; and (2) promptly file proof of such service on the docket. Counsel for respondents shall promptly enter notices of appearance. Pending the Court's decision, and unless and until the Court orders otherwise, the Court ORDERS that respondents shall not transfer petitioner out of this District. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (noting court's "express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction"). (Deputy Clerk VMG) (Entered: 05/18/2026)
May 18, 2026
Minute Order
#8
May 19, 2026
CERTIFICATE / PROOF of SERVICE by Sachin Sachin. (Virdi, Nareshwar) (Entered: 05/19/2026)
Main Document: Certificate / Proof of Service
#9
May 19, 2026
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 05/19/2026)
Main Document: CONSENT/DECLINE
#10
May 20, 2026
Opposition to Motion
Main Document: Opposition to Motion
#11
May 21, 2026
Order on Motion for TRO
Main Document: Order on Motion for TRO
#12
May 22, 2026
Judgment AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case
Main Document: Judgment AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case

Parties

Blanche
Party
(HC) Sachin
Party