Western District of Texas • 5:26-cv-02989
Mesa Mesa v. U.S. Attorney, Western District of Texas
Active
Case Information
Filed: May 06, 2026
Assigned to:
Jason K Pulliam
Referred to:
—
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Active
Last Activity:
July 13, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
May 06, 2026
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 11301), filed by Dianelys Mesa Mesa. (Attachments: # 1 Receipt)(r013) (Entered: 05/12/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
May 06, 2026
MOTION Requesting Court Assistance with Service of Process by Dianelys Mesa Mesa. (kc) (Entered: 05/12/2026)
Main Document:
Miscellaneous Relief
May 06, 2026
MOTION that Petitioner not be transferred (contained in petition) by Dianelys Mesa Mesa. (kc)
May 06, 2026
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Chestney (kc)
May 06, 2026
Case has been randomly assigned to the docket of Honorable Judge Jason K. Pulliam. (kc)
May 06, 2026
Possible Related closed case: 5:26cv202-OLG (kc)
#3
May 12, 2026
Case Opening Letter mailed to Dianelys Mesa Mesa. (kc) (Entered: 05/12/2026)
Main Document:
Case Opening Letter
May 12, 2026
Case Assigned/Reassigned
May 12, 2026
Miscellaneous Relief
May 12, 2026
Remark (No Doc#)
May 12, 2026
To be Referred to SA Mag Judge
#4
May 19, 2026
Text ORDER FOR SERVICE of 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. It is ORDERED that notice of electronic filing of 1 Petition and this Order to the United States Attorney in San Antonio, Texas shall constitute service on the Federal Respondents and on all Respondents unless otherwise contested. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Respondents shall file a response to the Petition within seven (7) days of the date of service. The Court construes the Petition as raising, at least in part, a Fifth Amendment Due Process claim which Respondents should address. See, e.g., Longoria Mendoza v. Noem, __ F. Supp. 3d __, No 5:26-CV-0728-JKP, 2026 WL 809441, at *610 (W.D. Tex. Feb. 26, 2026); Bonilla Chicas v. Warden, __ F. Supp.3d __, No. 26-CV-131, 2026 WL 539475, at *6 (S.D. Tex. Feb. 20, 2026); Marceau v. Noem, No. 26-CV-237-KC, 2026 WL 368953, at *1 (W.D. Tex. Feb. 9, 2026). Additionally, the response must identify: (1) Petitioner's alleged country of birth, so that Petitioner can be located in the Online Detainee Locator System; (2) Petitioner's alleged date of entry and statutory basis for removability; (3) any previous immigration detention history, e.g., whether Petitioner has previously been subject to immigration detention and, if so, the approximate date of Petitioner's previous release into the interior; and (4) Petitioner's alleged immigration status, e.g., whether Petitioner has a pending claim for asylum, withholding of removal, or protection under the Convention Against Torture or is subject to a final removal order. It is FURTHER ORDERED that, if Petitioner elects to file a reply, Petitioner may do so no later than seven days after the Respondents file their answers/responses. Signed by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ks1) (Entered: 05/19/2026)
May 19, 2026
Order
May 19, 2026
Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
May 19, 2026
Text Order DENYING [] Motion to Prevent Transfer. Petitioners transfer to another facility does not deprive this Court of jurisdiction over the Petition. See Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 441 (2004) (When the Government moves a habeas petitioner after she properly filed a petition naming her immediate custodian, the District Court retains jurisdiction and may direct the writ to any respondent within its jurisdiction who has legal authority to effectuate the prisoner's release. (citation modified)); see also, e.g., Mason v. Alatary, No. 9:23-CV-0193, 2023 WL 2965619, at *3 (N.D.N.Y. Apr. 17, 2023) (Because jurisdiction attaches on the initial filing for habeas corpus relief, the court maintains its jurisdiction even when a petitioner is transferred to a different judicial district. (citation modified)). Moreover, the Petition remaining with this Court conserves judicial resources. See Sambissa ex rel. Sambissa v. Noem, No. EP-25-CV-00237-DCG, 2025 WL 2946619, at *4-8 (W.D. Tex. Aug. 31, 2025). Signed by Judge Jason K. Pulliam (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ks1)
May 19, 2026
Text Order MOOTING 2 Motion Requesting Court Assistance with Service of Process entered by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ks1)
#5
May 26, 2026
Response
Main Document:
Response
#6
Jul 07, 2026
Notice of Change of Address
Main Document:
Notice of Change of Address
#7
Jul 09, 2026
Order
Main Document:
Order
#8
Jul 13, 2026
Order
Main Document:
Order
Parties
Mesa Mesa
Party
U.S. Attorney, Western District of Texas
Party