District of Massachusetts • 1:26-cv-12207

#1

May 14, 2026

PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) and Emergency MOTION for Stay of Removal Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number AMADC-11745961 Fee status: Filing Fee paid., filed by Felipe De Paula Ataide Almeida. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover, # 2 Category Form Category Form)(Silva, Jonatas) Modified on 5/15/2026 to modify docket text (CEH). (Entered: 05/14/2026)

#2

May 15, 2026

ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Angel Kelley assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley. (FGD) (Entered: 05/15/2026)

#3

May 15, 2026

General Order 19-02, dated June 1, 2019 regarding Public Access to Immigration Cases Restricted by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c). (CEH) (Entered: 05/15/2026)

#4

May 15, 2026

District Judge Angel Kelley: ORDER entered. Standing order Regarding Motion Practice. (CEH) (Entered: 05/15/2026)

#5

May 15, 2026

District Judge Angel Kelley: ORDER entered. Order Concerning Service of Petition, Stay of Transfer or Removal, and Required Response.(CEH) (Entered: 05/15/2026)

#6

May 15, 2026

Copy re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), 5 Service Order - 2241 Petition emailed to AUSA Michael Sady, Rayford Farquhar, and USAMA Civil Process on 5/15/2026 at 9:24 am and mailed to All Respondents (CEH) (Entered: 05/15/2026)

May 15, 2026

Notice of Case Assignment

May 15, 2026

Copy Mailed

#7

May 19, 2026

Notice of Appearance

#8

May 19, 2026

Extension of Time to File Response/Reply

#9

May 20, 2026

District Judge Angel Kelley: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered GRANTING 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to May 26, 2026 to File Response/Reply to Habeas Petition (CEH) (Entered: 05/20/2026)

May 20, 2026

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply

#10

May 26, 2026

Answer/Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241

#11

May 27, 2026

Appendix/Exhibit

#12

Jun 04, 2026

Memorandum & Order

#13

Jun 29, 2026

District Judge Angel Kelley: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. The Court issued an Order on June 4, 2026, granting Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. [Dkt. 12]. The Order directed the Parties to file a status report within fourteen calendar days informing the Court whether Petitioner has been granted a bond hearing. [Id.]. The deadline of June 18, 2026, has passed without an update as to Petitioner’s hearing. The Parties are hereby directed to file an update within seven (7) days of the entry of this Order regarding the status of Petitioner’s 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) bond hearing.(CEH) (Entered: 06/29/2026)

#14

Jun 29, 2026

Status Report

Jun 29, 2026

Order

#15

Jun 30, 2026

District Judge Angel Kelley: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. On June 4, 2026, this Court GRANTED Petitioner's Habeas Petition. [Dkt. 12]. On June 29, 2026, Respondents provided a Status Report indicating that Petitioner had a bond hearing and was denied bond after the Immigration Judge found he presented a danger to the community by clear and convincing evidence, and that no alternatives to detention exist that would ensure the safety of the community. [Dkt. 14]. As a result, absent objection within the next seven (7) calendar days, the Court will terminate the suit. (CEH) (Entered: 06/30/2026)

Jun 30, 2026

Order

#16

Jul 02, 2026

Status Report

#17

Jul 07, 2026

District Judge Angel Kelley: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. On June 4, 2026, the Court granted Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. [Dkt. 12]. On June 29, 2026, Respondents provided a Status Report indicating that Petitioner had a bond hearing on June 11, 2026, and was denied bond after the Immigration Judge found that he presented a danger to the community by clear and convincing evidence. [Dkt. 14]. The Immigration Judge allegedly relied on the existence of an active arrest warrant for Petitioner in Brazil in making her determination. [See Dkt. 16]. On July 2, 2026, Petitioner filed a Status Report representing that on June 17, 2026, the Brazilian court revoked his arrest warrant and concluded that continued preventive detention was no longer necessary. [Seeid.]. Petitioner contends that this revocation affects the factual predicate supporting the Immigration Judge’s bond denial, and requests that the Court direct supplemental briefing in light of these changes. [Id.].Petitioner’s request is ALLOWED. The parties are DIRECTED to submit supplemental briefing limited to addressing the impact of the revocation of the Brazilian arrest warrant on Petitioner’s custody status. Petitioner shall have seven (7) days from the entry of this Order to file a brief. Respondents shall have seven (7) days to file a response, if any.(CEH) (Entered: 07/07/2026)

Jul 07, 2026

Order