Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-03692

#1

May 13, 2026

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against All Defendants by Lakhwinder Singh. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-13319976) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Proposed Order)(Howard, Kyle) (Entered: 05/13/2026)

#2

May 13, 2026

CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Lakhwinder Singh. (Howard, Kyle) (Entered: 05/13/2026)

#3

May 13, 2026

MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Lakhwinder Singh. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration, # 2 Memorandum, # 3 Proposed Order)(Howard, Kyle) (Entered: 05/13/2026)

#4

May 13, 2026

IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS (Attachments: # 1 Litigant Letter) (Deputy Clerk CLA) (Entered: 05/13/2026)

#5

May 13, 2026

CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 05/13/2026)

#6

May 13, 2026

MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 5/13/2026: The Court has reviewed Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1 ) and Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (ECF No. 3 ). The issues raised in Count 4 of the Petition appear to mirror those previously addressed by the Court in many prior cases. See Garcia Mariagua v. Chestnut, No. 1:25-cv-01744-DJC-CSK; Ortega v. Noem, No. 1:25-cv-01663-DJC-CKD; Lopez v. Lyons, No. 2:25-cv-03174-DJC-CKD. The Court intends to rule directly on the 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus, with the understanding that the Court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the 3 motion for temporary restraining order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); Dzhabrailov v. Decker, No. 20-cv-03118-PMH, 2020 WL 2731966, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. May 26, 2020) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). On or before May 18, 2026, Respondents are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that render it distinguishable from the Court's prior orders listed above and justify denying the petition, or indicate this matter is not substantively distinguishable. Petitioner may file a reply on or before May 19, 2026. This matter is not set for a hearing though the Court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary. [TEXT ONLY ORDER] (Deputy Clerk GJM) (Entered: 05/13/2026)

May 13, 2026

Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings

#8

Jun 01, 2026

Order AND Order on Motion for TRO AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case

#9

Jun 01, 2026

Judgment