Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-03681

#1

May 13, 2026

2241 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Warden, Central Valley Annex by Rodylaidi Martinez Rodriguez. [$5 filing fee received. Receipt to be docketed 5/16/2026]. (Deputy Clerk VLK) (Entered: 05/13/2026)

#2

May 13, 2026

MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Rodylaidi Martinez Rodriguez. (Deputy Clerk VLK) (Entered: 05/13/2026)

#3

May 13, 2026

IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS (Deputy Clerk VLK) (Entered: 05/13/2026)

#4

May 13, 2026

CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 05/13/2026)

May 13, 2026

Service by Mail

May 13, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 3 Immigration New Case Documents served on Rodylaidi Martinez Rodriguez. (Deputy Clerk VLK)

#5

May 14, 2026

MINUTE ORDER issued by the Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 5/14/2026: The court has reviewed Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. The court has previously addressed the legal issues raised by Count Two of the Petition. See e.g., Selis Tinoco v. Noem, 1:25-cv-01762-DC-JDP, 2025 WL 3567862 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2025), Labrador-Prato v. Noem, 1:25-cv-01598-DC-SCR, 2025 WL 3458802 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2025), and D.L.C. v. Wofford, 1:25-cv-01996-DC-JDP, 2026 WL 25511 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2026). The court is contemplating ruling directly on the 1 Petition, with the understanding that the court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); A.R. v. Chestnut, No. 1:26-cv-00551-KES-SAB, 2026 WL 227112, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2026) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). Respondents shall file an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to the 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by 12:00 PM on 5/18/2026. In their response, Respondents shall substantively address whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that materially distinguish it from the court's prior orders listed above. Petitioner may file a Reply by 6/1/2026. Both parties should address whether they oppose the court ruling directly on the Petition, albeit as to Count Two only, to the extent a ruling on that Count entitles Petitioner to the relief sought in the Petition. The matter is not set for a hearing though the court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS) (Entered: 05/14/2026)

May 14, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: Minute Order, filed at Doc. No. 5, served on Rodylaidi Martinez Rodriguez. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS)

May 14, 2026

Minute Order AND ~Util - Set Motion and F&R Deadlines/Hearings

May 14, 2026

Service by Mail

#6

May 16, 2026

Opposition to Motion

Jun 05, 2026

Minute Order AND Order on Motion for TRO

Jun 05, 2026

Service by Mail