Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-03681
(HC) Martinez Rodriguez v. Warden, Central Valley Annex
Active
Case Information
Filed: May 13, 2026
Assigned to:
Dena M. Coggins
Referred to:
Chi Soo Kim
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
8:1105(a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Active
Last Activity:
October 07, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
May 13, 2026
2241 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Warden, Central Valley Annex by Rodylaidi Martinez Rodriguez. [$5 filing fee received. Receipt to be docketed 5/16/2026]. (Deputy Clerk VLK) (Entered: 05/13/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
May 13, 2026
MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Rodylaidi Martinez Rodriguez. (Deputy Clerk VLK) (Entered: 05/13/2026)
Main Document:
Temporary Restraining Order
#3
May 13, 2026
IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS (Deputy Clerk VLK) (Entered: 05/13/2026)
Main Document:
Immigration New Case Documents
#4
May 13, 2026
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 05/13/2026)
Main Document:
CONSENT/DECLINE
May 13, 2026
Service by Mail
May 13, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 3 Immigration New Case Documents served on Rodylaidi Martinez Rodriguez. (Deputy Clerk VLK)
#5
May 14, 2026
MINUTE ORDER issued by the Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 5/14/2026: The court has reviewed Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. The court has previously addressed the legal issues raised by Count Two of the Petition. See e.g., Selis Tinoco v. Noem, 1:25-cv-01762-DC-JDP, 2025 WL 3567862 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2025), Labrador-Prato v. Noem, 1:25-cv-01598-DC-SCR, 2025 WL 3458802 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2025), and D.L.C. v. Wofford, 1:25-cv-01996-DC-JDP, 2026 WL 25511 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2026). The court is contemplating ruling directly on the 1 Petition, with the understanding that the court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); A.R. v. Chestnut, No. 1:26-cv-00551-KES-SAB, 2026 WL 227112, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2026) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). Respondents shall file an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to the 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by 12:00 PM on 5/18/2026. In their response, Respondents shall substantively address whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that materially distinguish it from the court's prior orders listed above. Petitioner may file a Reply by 6/1/2026. Both parties should address whether they oppose the court ruling directly on the Petition, albeit as to Count Two only, to the extent a ruling on that Count entitles Petitioner to the relief sought in the Petition. The matter is not set for a hearing though the court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS) (Entered: 05/14/2026)
May 14, 2026
Service by Mail
May 14, 2026
Minute Order AND ~Util - Set Motion and F&R Deadlines/Hearings
May 14, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: Minute Order, filed at Doc. No. 5, served on Rodylaidi Martinez Rodriguez. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS)
#6
May 16, 2026
Opposition to Motion
Main Document:
Opposition to Motion
Jun 05, 2026
Service by Mail
Jun 05, 2026
Minute Order AND Order on Motion for TRO
#9
Jun 29, 2026
Findings and Recommendations
Jun 29, 2026
Service by Mail
#10
Jul 02, 2026
Objections to Findings and Recommendations
Main Document:
Objections to Findings and Recommendations
#11
Aug 11, 2026
Miscellaneous Relief
Main Document:
Miscellaneous Relief
#12
Sep 23, 2026
Miscellaneous Relief
Main Document:
Miscellaneous Relief
#13
Oct 02, 2026
ORDER signed by District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 10/01/26 DECLINES TO ADOPT 9 Findings and Recommendations. The 1 Petition for writ of habeas corpus is GRANTED IN PART as follows: Within 14 days from the date of entry of this order, Responden ts are ORDERED to provide Petitioner Rodylaidi Martinez Rodriguez (A-208-165-222) a bond hearing before an immigration judge at which the Government shall bear the burden of proving, by clear and convincing evidence, that Petitioner is either a fligh t risk or risk to community safety such that Petitioner's continued immigration detention is justified; and If Respondents fail to provide Petitioner a bond hearing within 14 days, Petitioner shall be immediately released from Respondents' custody on the same terms as Petitioner's previous release. Petitioner's 11 Motion to supplement objections and 12 Renewed Motion for expedited resolution are DENIED as MOOT by this order. The Clerk is directed to serve this order on the Central Valley Annex Detention Center to enter judgment for Petitioner. CASE CLOSED. (cc Central Valley Annex) (Deputy Clerk KML)
#14
Oct 02, 2026
Judgment
Main Document:
Judgment
Oct 02, 2026
Service by Mail
#15
Oct 05, 2026
Miscellaneous Relief
Main Document:
Miscellaneous Relief
#16
Oct 07, 2026
AMENDED ORDER signed by District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 10/6/2026 DECLINING to ADOPT the 9 Findings and Recommendations and GRANTING IN PART the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus as follows. Within 14 days from this Amended Order Responden ts are ORDERED to provide Petitioner Rodylaidi Martinez Rodriguez 244-513-087 a bond hearing before an immigration judge at which the government shall bear the burden of proving, by clear and convincing evidence, that Petitioner is either a flight ri sk or risk to community safety such that Petitioner's continued immigration detention is justified. If Respondents fail to provide Petitioner a bond hearing within 14 days, Petitioner is ORDERED to be IMMEDIATELY RELEASED from Respondents custod y on the same terms as Petitioner's previous release. The 11 Motion to Supplement Objections and 12 Renewed Motion for Expedited Resolution is DENIED as moot and the 15 Motion for Order Modification is GRANTED. This case remains CLOSED. (cc Golden Annex) (Deputy Clerk AMW)
Oct 07, 2026
Service by Mail
Parties
(HC) Martinez Rodriguez
Party
Warden, Central Valley Annex
Party