Active
Case Information
Filed: May 12, 2026
Assigned to:
Leo Theodore Sorokin
Referred to:
—
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Active
Last Activity:
May 15, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
May 12, 2026
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number AMADC-11738386 Fee status: Filing Fee paid., filed by Francisco Elias Ventura Lopez. (Attachments: # 1 Category Form, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sniffin, Ondine) Modified on 5/12/2026 to remove duplicate text (LBO). (Entered: 05/12/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241
#2
May 12, 2026
ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Leo T. Sorokin assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal. (MAC) (Entered: 05/12/2026)
#3
May 12, 2026
General Order 19-02, dated June 1, 2019 regarding Public Access to Immigration Cases Restricted by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c). (FGD) (Entered: 05/12/2026)
Main Document:
General Order 19-02
#4
May 12, 2026
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. ORDER CONCERNING SERVICE OF PETITION AND STAY OF TRANSFER OR REMOVAL. (FGD) (Main Document 4 replaced on 5/12/2026) (FGD). (Entered: 05/12/2026)
Main Document:
Service Order-2241 Petition
#5
May 12, 2026
Copy re 4 Service Order - 2241 Petition, 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), emailed to Duty AUSA and mailed to Respondents and USAO on 5/12/2026. (FGD) (Entered: 05/12/2026)
#6
May 12, 2026
APPENDIX/EXHIBIT re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), HABEAS EVIDENCE EXHIBITS by Francisco Elias Ventura Lopez. (Sniffin, Ondine) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/13/2026: # 1 Exhibit 2, # 2 Exhibit 3) (FGD). Modified on 5/13/2026: Separated exhibits into individual PDFs. (FGD) (Entered: 05/12/2026)
Main Document:
Appendix/Exhibit
May 12, 2026
Notice of Case Assignment
May 12, 2026
Copy Mailed
#7
May 13, 2026
Notice of Appearance
Main Document:
Notice of Appearance
#8
May 13, 2026
Answer/Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241
Main Document:
Answer/Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241
#9
May 14, 2026
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered: re 8 RESPONSE/ANSWER to Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241). Francisco Elias Ventura Lopez, a citizen of Guatemala, has filed a petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 challenging his detention by the respondents. Doc. No. 1 . Ventura Lopez alleges, and offers supporting documents showing, that he arrived in the United States nearly ten years ago as a minor, and was released by immigration officers after a Notice to Appear issued. In 2020, USCIS granted him Special Immigrant Juvenile Status and deferred action. In 2023, an immigration judge terminated his removal proceedings without objection from the respondents. He has no criminal convictions and no pending criminal charges. Nevertheless, he was arrested at a recent routine check-in at an ICE field office and is now detained after the unlawful termination of his release without notice and without an individualized finding supporting such termination. He alleges no changes in circumstances, such as a violation of the conditions of his supervision, and claims his detention violates the Constitution and federal statutes. The respondents do not contest the facts alleged by Ventura Lopez, nor do they identify any reason to suggest he poses a risk of danger or flight. See Doc. No. 8 . They incorporate their legal arguments from prior cases, in which they defended the relevant noncitizens’ continued detention by claiming it was permitted (and, indeed, mandated) by 8 U.S.C. § 1225. As the Court concluded in those cases, and on the facts alleged here, Ventura Lopez is not subject to mandatory detention under Section 1225. His petition is therefore ALLOWED. Because the violation before the Court arises from the termination of Ventura Lopez’s release without any change in circumstances and without any process, let alone due process, the Court finds that ordering a bond hearing is not an adequate remedy. See Murzi v. Noem, No. 26-cv-359, 2026 WL 395111, at *1-2 (D. Colo. Feb. 12, 2026) (citing cases reaching same conclusion). Accordingly, the respondents shall IMMEDIATELY RELEASE Ventura Lopez, no later than 6 PM today, May 14, 2026, and they shall not retaliate against him for the filing of this habeas petition. The respondents shall file a status report by tomorrow, May 15, 2026, confirming that Ventura Lopez has been released in compliance with this Order.(FGD) (Entered: 05/14/2026)
#11
May 14, 2026
Response to Court Order
Main Document:
Response to Court Order
May 14, 2026
Order AND ~Util - Set Deadlines
May 14, 2026
Order
#12
May 15, 2026
Judgment
Main Document:
Judgment
Parties
Party
Party
Party
Party
Attorney
Attorney
Firm