District of Massachusetts • 1:26-cv-12146

#1

May 12, 2026

First PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number AMADC-11738237 Fee status: Filing Fee paid., filed by Maria Magdalena Tacuri Yopangue. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet for Tacuri Yopangue Habeas Petition, # 2 Category Form for Tacuri Yopangue Habeas Petition)(Cornish, Carin) Modified on 5/12/2026 to remove duplicate text (LBO). (Entered: 05/12/2026)

#2

May 12, 2026

ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Myong J. Joun assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal. (MAC) (Entered: 05/12/2026)

#3

May 12, 2026

General Order 19-02, dated June 1, 2019 regarding Public Access to Immigration Cases Restricted by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c). (SP) (Entered: 05/12/2026)

#4

May 12, 2026

Judge Myong J. Joun: ORDER entered. SERVICE ORDER re 2241 Petition. Order entered pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2243 governing Section 2241 cases for service on respondents. The answer or responsive pleading is due no later than May 15, 2026.(SP) (Entered: 05/12/2026)

#5

May 12, 2026

Copy re 4 Service Order - 2241 Petition, 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), mailed to All Respondents on 5/12/2026. (SP) (Entered: 05/12/2026)

May 12, 2026

Notice of Case Assignment

May 12, 2026

Copy Mailed

#6

May 13, 2026

Notice of Appearance

#7

May 15, 2026

Response - not related to a motion

#8

May 18, 2026

Judge Myong J. Joun: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. On May 12, 2026, Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Doc. No. 1 . Although Petitioner contends she was “unlawfully detained,” the Petition does not allege any supporting facts for that claim. As Respondents note, Rule 2(c) of the Habeas Rules and Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure require a petitioner to plead facts supporting the asserted grounds for relief. See Doc. No. 7 at 2. The Petition does not satisfy those pleading requirements. See, e.g., Pereira v. Moniz et al., 26-cv-10008 at *1 (D. Mass. Jan. 21, 2026).Accordingly, the Petition is DISMISSED without prejudice. Petitioner may file a new habeas petition that includes factual allegations sufficient to satisfy the pleading standards set forth in Rule 2(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 8. In addition, if Petitioner remains in New Hampshire, see Doc. No. 7 at 1, any refiled petition should be filed in the appropriate federal district there, as jurisdiction would no longer be proper in the District of Massachusetts.(SP) (Entered: 05/18/2026)

#9

May 18, 2026

Judge Myong J. Joun: ORDER entered. ORDER DISMISSING CASE.(SP) (Entered: 05/18/2026)

May 18, 2026

Order