Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-03594
(HC) Alonso Lopez v. Department of Homeland Security
Completed
Case Information
Filed: May 11, 2026
Assigned to:
Dale Alan Drozd
Referred to:
Carolyn K. Delaney
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
8:1105(a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Completed: June 15, 2026
Last Activity:
June 15, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
May 11, 2026
2241 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Department of Homeland Security by Denis Alonso Lopez. (Deputy Clerk JAW) (Entered: 05/12/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
May 11, 2026
MOTION to APPOINT COUNSEL by Denis Alonso Lopez. (Deputy Clerk JAW) (Entered: 05/12/2026)
Main Document:
Appoint Counsel
May 11, 2026
RECEIPT number 100008151 for $5.00 for Denis Lopez. (Deputy Clerk JAW)
#3
May 12, 2026
IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS (Deputy Clerk JAW) (Entered: 05/12/2026)
Main Document:
Immigration New Case Documents
#4
May 12, 2026
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 05/12/2026)
Main Document:
CONSENT/DECLINE
May 12, 2026
Service by Mail
May 12, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 3 Immigration New Case Documents served on Denis Alonso Lopez. (Deputy Clerk JAW)
#5
May 14, 2026
Order AND Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings
May 14, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 5 Order and Pro Se IFP Application served on Denis Alonso Lopez. (Deputy Clerk KS)
May 14, 2026
Service by Mail
#6
May 29, 2026
MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy for Chief Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/29/2026: The court has been notified by the Office of the Federal Defender that counsel has not yet been identified and requests an extension of time for appointment of counsel. The Office of the Federal Defender is GRANTED until 6/5/2026 for appointment of counsel. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk LMK) (Entered: 05/29/2026)
#7
May 29, 2026
MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy for Chief Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/29/2026: The court has been notified of counsel's contact information, pursuant to the Order at ECF 5 . Attorney Danica Mazenko is hereby appointed as counsel for Petitioner. The Courtroom Deputy shall update the docket to reflect Attorney Danica Mazenko, 2443 Fair Oaks Blvd., Suite 486, Sacramento, CA 95825, 619-669-5693, DMazenkoLaw@gmail.com, as counsel for Petitioner in this matter. (Text Only Entry) (cc: Federal Defender Habeas Appointment) (Deputy Clerk LMK) (Entered: 05/29/2026)
May 29, 2026
Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings
May 29, 2026
Service by Mail
May 29, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 6 Minute Order served on Denis Alonso Lopez. (Deputy Clerk LMK)
May 29, 2026
Minute Order AND ~Util - Add and Terminate Attorneys
#8
Jun 08, 2026
Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Main Document:
Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#9
Jun 08, 2026
Miscellaneous Relief
Main Document:
Miscellaneous Relief
#10
Jun 10, 2026
MINUTE ORDER issued by Relief Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 06/10/2026: Pending the issuance of the court's order resolving the pending 9 motion for temporary restraining order, and unless and until the court orders otherwise, the court ORDERS that respondent shall not take any action to remove petitioner from the United States or to move petitioner out of the Eastern District of California. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (acknowledging the court's express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction). Given the exigent circumstances present, the court finds that this order is warranted to maintain the status quo pending its forthcoming order resolving petitioner's pending 9 motion for temporary restraining order. Further, the court has conducted a preliminary review of the pending motion and petition for writ of habeas corpus and observes that this case may involve core issues that the undersigned has previously addressed in this context. Accordingly, the parties are advised that if the court concludes that petitioner is entitled to the relief that is requested in the pending motion, then the court will also rule on the merits of the underlying petition. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); Dzhabrailov v. Decker, No. 20-cv-03118-PMH, 2020 WL 2731966 (S.D.N.Y. May 26, 2020) (considering the merits of the habeas petition and motion for preliminary injunction simultaneously). Respondent shall file a written opposition to the pending 9 motion for temporary restraining order by 5:00 PM on Thursday, 6/11/2026. In that opposition, respondent shall substantively address whether any provision of law or fact in this case would distinguish it from this court's decisions in Ayala Cajina v. Wofford, No. 1:25-cv-01566-DAD-AC (HC), 2025 WL 3251083 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 21, 2025); Perez v. Albarran, No. 1:25-cv-01540-DAD-CSK (HC), 2025 WL 3187578 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2025); Chavarria v. Chestnut, No. 1:25-cv-01755-DAD-AC, 2025 WL 3533606 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2025); Yang v. Kaiser, No. 2:25-cv-02205-DAD-AC (HC), 2025 WL 2791778 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2025); Quichimbo-Jimenez v. Warden, California City Correctional Center, 2:26-cv-00739-DAD-EFB (HC), 2026 WL 679378 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 10, 2026); Cardenas v. Chestnut, et al., No. 1:26-cv-02073-DAD-SCR (HC), 2026 WL 785871 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2026); J.P.C. v. Chestnut, et al., 1:26-cv-02108-DAD-JDP, 2026 WL 788129 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2026), and other similar cases previously decided by this court, or otherwise indicate that the matter is not substantively distinguishable. The court will construe failure to distinguish the above cited cases as a concession that the cases are not substantively distinguishable. If respondent opposes this court ruling on the underlying petition, then respondent is DIRECTED to indicate so and provide substantive reasons in support thereof in its opposition. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRN) (Entered: 06/10/2026)
Jun 10, 2026
Minute Order
#11
Jun 12, 2026
ANSWER (Opposition) to 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and OPPOSITION to 9 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by Respondent Department of Homeland Security. (Yu, Jonathan) Modified on 6/17/2026 (KS). (Entered: 06/12/2026)
Main Document:
ANSWER
#12
Jun 15, 2026
Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Main Document:
Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#13
Jun 15, 2026
Order AND Order on Motion for TRO AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case
#14
Jun 15, 2026
Judgment
Main Document:
Judgment
Parties
Department of Homeland Security
Party
(HC) Alonso Lopez
Party