Western District of Pennsylvania • 3:26-cv-00870

#1

May 11, 2026

PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $5, receipt number APAWDC-9567719), filed by RAIKO AROCHA PEREZ. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit List, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Civil Cover Sheet, # 7 Certificate of Service) (Campos, Jose) (Entered: 05/11/2026)

#2

May 12, 2026

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Christy Criswell Wiegand on 5/12/2026. (bjw) (Entered: 05/12/2026)

May 12, 2026

Judge Christy Criswell Wiegand added. (ert)

#3

May 14, 2026

MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by RAIKO AROCHA PEREZ. (Attachments: # 1 Supplement Memorandum in support of motion, # 2 Proposed Order, # 3 Certificate of Service) (Campos, Jose) (Entered: 05/14/2026)

#4

May 14, 2026

CERTIFICATE of Compliance re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, 2 Case Management Order by Jose C Campos on behalf of RAIKO AROCHA PEREZ (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A) (Campos, Jose) (Entered: 05/14/2026)

#5

May 14, 2026

ORDER DENYING 3 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. In the 3 Motion, Petitioner seeks, inter alia, his immediate release from custody. Given that Petitioner is requesting affirmative relief rather than maintenance of the status quo, Petitioner's request goes beyond the limited, temporary nature of a TRO and requires giving Respondents notice and an opportunity to be heard. See Hope v. Warden York County Prison, 956 F.3d 156, 162 (3d Cir. 2020). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 3 Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order is DENIED.. Signed by Judge Christy Criswell Wiegand on 5/14/2026. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (drc) (Entered: 05/14/2026)

May 14, 2026

Order on Motion for TRO

May 18, 2026

Order

#9

May 19, 2026

ORDER GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner, a noncitizen detained by Respondents at Moshannon Valley Processing Center, seeks, inter alia, immediate release from custody or, in the alternative, an individualized bond hearing before an immigration judge. The parties agree that the issue before the Court is whether Petitioner is subject to discretionary detention pursuant to 8 U.S.C. §1226(a) and therefore entitled to a bond hearing or mandatory detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b) and therefore not entitled to a bond hearing. Respondents rely on the BIA's decisions in Matter of Yajure Hurtado, 29 I. & N. Dec. 216 (B.I.A. 2025) and/or Matter of Q. Li, 29 I. & N. Dec. 66 (B.I.A. 2025). The Third Circuit has not yet ruled on this issue and there is a split among several Courts of Appeals. See Buenrostro-Mendez v. Bondi, 166 F.4th 494 (5th Cir. 2026) (noncitizens present in the United States who have not been admitted are "applicants for admission" subject to mandatory detention); see also Avila v. Bondi, No. 25-3248, 2026 WL 819258 (8th Cir. Mar. 25, 2026) (same); but see Cunha v. Freden, No. 25-3141, 2026 WL 1146044, at *2 (2d Cir. Apr. 28, 2026) ("Section 1225(b)(2)(A) does not apply to such noncitizens... who are present in the United States after entering the country without inspection and admission, and who were not apprehended while entering the country or shortly thereafter"); Castanon-Nava v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 161 F.4th 1048, 1060-62 (7th Cir. 2025) (holding that the government is unlikely to succeed on the merits of its argument that § 1225(b) governs noncitizens already in the United States whom ICE detained in Chicago). This Court agrees with the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. And for the reasons set forth in this Court's prior decisions, the Court concludes that: Petitioner is not required to exhaust administrative remedies as doing so would be futile; and Petitioner is subject to discretionary detention pursuant to § 1226(a) and is therefore entitled to a bond hearing. See, e.g., Zhunio v. Warden et al., No. 3:26-CV-71-CCW, ECF No. 7 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 6, 2026) (Wiegand, J.) (noncitizen who entered the United States without inspection and resided continuously in the interior of the country thereafter subject to discretionary detention pursuant to § 1226(a)); Padilla Ventura v. Rose et al., No. 3:26-cv-65-CCW, ECF No. 13 (W.D. Pa. February 3, 2026) (Wiegand, J.) (same). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is GRANTED IN PART, as follows: within seven days of this Order, Petitioner must receive an individualized bond hearing conducted by an immigration judge pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1226. If Petitioner does not receive a bond hearing by that date, or if the immigration judge declines to conduct a bond hearing based on Matter of Yajure Hurtado, Respondents shall immediately release Petitioner from custody. Within seven days of the immigration judge's decision, the parties must file a joint notice on the docket advising the Court of the outcome of the bond hearing. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition is DENIED in all other respects. In particular, for the reasons set forth in this Court's prior decisions, the Court DENIES Petitioner's request for costs and attorney's fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) because Respondents' position, while incorrect, was substantially justified. See Orellana Rivas v. Oddo et al., No. 3:26-cv-246-CCW, ECF No. 14 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 10, 2026) (Wiegand, J.). The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case CLOSED. Signed by Judge Christy Criswell Wiegand on 5/19/2026. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (bjw) (Entered: 05/19/2026)

#10

May 19, 2026

FINAL JUDGMENT entered consistent with the above order (ECF No. 9). Signed by Judge Christy Criswell Wiegand on 5/19/2026. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (bjw) (Entered: 05/19/2026)

May 19, 2026

Order