Eastern District of California • 1:25-cv-01546

#1

Nov 12, 2025

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against E.A. P.C. by E.A. P.C.. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-12592503) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Affidavit of Natalia Vieira Santanna, # 3 Exhibit 1- Notice to Appear, # 4 Exhibit 2- Passport, # 5 Exhibit 3- Recommendation letter, # 6 Exhibit 4- Recommendation letter)(Vieira Santanna, Natalia) (Entered: 11/12/2025)

#2

Nov 12, 2025

MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by E.A. P.C.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit, # 2 Exhibit 1- Notice to Appear, # 3 Exhibit 2- Passport, # 4 Exhibit 3- letter of recommendation, # 5 Exhibit 4- letter of recommendation, # 6 Proposed Order, # 7 Notice TRO Checklist)(Vieira Santanna, Natalia) (Entered: 11/12/2025)

#3

Nov 12, 2025

Miscellaneous Relief

#4

Nov 12, 2025

ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due within 30 days. (Deputy Clerk JPX) (Entered: 11/12/2025)

#5

Nov 12, 2025

CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Vieira Santanna, Natalia) (Entered: 11/12/2025)

#6

Nov 13, 2025

MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) The Court has reviewed the Petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. 1 ) and the related request for emergency injunctive relief (Doc. 2 ). Based on the record filed thus far, it appears Petitioner may be able to demonstrate success on the due process claim and that some form of immediate relief may be appropriate. Thus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2243, Respondents are ordered to show cause in writing no later than noon on November 18, 2025 why the Court should not grant Petitioner's motion for a temporary restraining order. Any response SHALL provide the Court with copies of all referenced/relevant portions of Petitioner's A-File and other supporting documents, including records that document any relevant violations of supervised release. Petitioner may file a reply no later than noon on November 20, 2025. The Court further directs the parties to indicate on or before their respective filing deadlines (1) whether they are demanding a hearing; and (2) whether they agree to convert the request for a TRO into a preliminary injunction without further briefing. Depending on the content of the filings, the Court may set a hearing or may rule on the papers.In the meantime, unless and until the Court orders otherwise, the Court ORDERS that Respondents shall not remove Petitioner from the United States nor transfer Petitioner out of this District. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (noting the court's "express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction"). Given the exigent circumstances, the Court finds that this order is warranted to maintain the status quo pending the hearing and any subsequent order and finds that Petitioner has satisfied the factors governing the issuance of such preliminary relief.No later than November 13, 2025, to the extent not already accomplished, Petitioner's counsel is directed: (1) to serve respondents with a copy of the Petition, the motion for temporary restraining order, and accompanying papers, along with a copy of this Order, by e-mail to all appropriate recipients including the United States Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of California and by overnight mail; and (2) promptly file proof of such service on the docket. Counsel for respondents shall promptly enter notices of appearance signed by District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on November 13, 2025. (Deputy Clerk IM) (Entered: 11/13/2025)

#7

Nov 13, 2025

CERTIFICATE / PROOF of SERVICE by E.A. P.C.. (Vieira Santanna, Natalia) (Entered: 11/13/2025)

Nov 13, 2025

Minute Order

#8

Nov 16, 2025

DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Samuel E. Stefanki, GOVT for Sergio Albarran,Samuel E. Stefanki, GOVT for Pam Bondi,Samuel E. Stefanki, GOVT for Todd Lyons,Samuel E. Stefanki, GOVT for Kristi Noem,Samuel E. Stefanki, GOVT for Minga Wofford (Stefanki, Samuel) (Entered: 11/16/2025)

#9

Nov 16, 2025

CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Stefanki, Samuel) (Entered: 11/16/2025)

#10

Nov 18, 2025

Opposition to Motion

#11

Nov 20, 2025

REPLY by E.A. P.C. re 10 Opposition to Motion. (Vieira Santanna, Natalia) (Entered: 11/20/2025)

#12

Nov 25, 2025

Order on Motion for TRO

#13

Dec 02, 2025

MINUTE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker on 12/02/2025: As the deadline to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to Petitioner's pending motion to proceed via pseudonym (Doc. 3 ) has passed, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Respondents shall file no later than December 8, 2025, either an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 230. Petitioner may file any optional reply to the motion within ten days of Respondents' filing ordered hereby. (Deputy Clerk CRB) (Entered: 12/02/2025)

Dec 02, 2025

Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings

#14

Dec 10, 2025

MINUTE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker on 12/10/2025: On December 2, 2025, the Court ordered Respondents to file no later than December 8, 2025, either an opposition or statement of non-opposition to Petitioner's pending motion to proceed via pseudonym (Doc. 3 ). (Doc. 13 ) (citing E.D. Cal. L.R. 230). Respondents have failed to timely comply with the Court's order. Accordingly, Respondents are HEREBY ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing within two (2) days of entry of this order why sanctions should not be imposed for their failure to comply with the Court's order and the Local Rules. The filing by that same deadline of an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the pending motion to proceed via pseudonym will not relieve Respondents of showing cause in writing why sanctions should not be imposed. Failure to timely comply with this Order will result in the imposition of sanctions. (Deputy Clerk CRB) (Entered: 12/10/2025)

#15

Dec 10, 2025

RESPONSE to 14 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE by Sergio Albarran, Pam Bondi, Todd Lyons, Kristi Noem, Minga Wofford. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Stefanki, Samuel) (Entered: 12/10/2025)

Dec 10, 2025

Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings

#16

Dec 11, 2025

MINUTE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker on 12/11/2025: The Court has considered the representations by counsel for Respondents (Doc. 15 ) in responding to the Court's order to show cause (Doc. 14 ) and concludes that counsel's conduct cited therein is the result of excusable neglect. See In re Veritas Software Corp. Sec. Litig., 496 F.3d 962, 973 (9th Cir. 2007). Accordingly, the Court finds good cause to discharge the Order to Show Cause, and it is HEREBY ORDERED that the Court's Order to Show Cause (Doc. 14 ) is DISCHARGED without imposition of sanctions. (Deputy Clerk CRB) (Entered: 12/11/2025)

#17

Dec 11, 2025

Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief

Dec 11, 2025

Minute Order

#18

Dec 18, 2025

Notice (Other)

#19

Jan 06, 2026

Findings and Recommendations

#20

Jan 21, 2026

Objections to Findings and Recommendations

#21

Jan 29, 2026

Findings and Recommendations AND Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations

#22

Jan 29, 2026

Judgment