Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-03537

#1

May 07, 2026

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Warden by Oscar Mauricio Ospina Palacios. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-13295866) (Ramos, Julio) (Entered: 05/07/2026)

#2

May 07, 2026

CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Oscar Mauricio Ospina Palacios. (Ramos, Julio) (Entered: 05/07/2026)

#3

May 07, 2026

IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS (Attachments: # 1 Litigant Letter) (Deputy Clerk CLA) (Entered: 05/07/2026)

#4

May 07, 2026

EO: The court has received and reviewed Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus, Dkt. No. 1 . Pending the court's decision on the petition, and unless and until the court orders otherwise, the court ORDERS that Respondents shall not transfer Petitioner out of this District. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (noting court's "express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction").The issues raised in the petition appear to mirror those previously addressed by this court and others in many prior cases, particularly whether Petitioner's due process rights have been violated. See, e.g., Sergio D.L.S. v. Warden, Cal. City Correctional Ctr., No. 1:26-cv-02821-MWJS, 2026 WL 1049713 (E.D. Cal); A.J.S.M.P. v. Mullin, No. 1:26-cv-03163-MWJS (E.D. Cal.); Mantilla-Zambrano v. Noem, 26-cv-02925-MWJS (E.D. Cal.); Pengling Miao v. Chestnut, No. 1:26-cv-01271, 2026 WL 947020 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 8, 2026). Given the substantial percolation of these issues, the court intends to rule directly on the petition. See 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."). On or before May 11, 2026, Respondents are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that render it distinguishable from prior orders such as the ones listed above and justify denying the Petition, or indicate this matter is not substantively distinguishable. Petitioner may file a reply on or before May 13, 2026. This matter is not set for a hearing though the court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary.IT IS SO ORDERED. (JUDGE MICAH W. J. SMITH) (ab) (Entered: 05/07/2026)

May 07, 2026

Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings

#5

May 08, 2026

CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 05/08/2026)

May 20, 2026

Minute Order

#10

May 22, 2026

Order

#11

May 22, 2026

Judgment AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case