Central District of California • 5:26-cv-02399
Gurmej Singh v. Fereti Semaia
Active
Case Information
Filed: May 06, 2026
Assigned to:
Rozella A. Oliver
Referred to:
—
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Active
Last Activity:
May 20, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
May 06, 2026
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody (28 USC 2241), Receipt No. ACACDC-42197492 for $5 filing fee, filed by Petitioner Gurmej Singh. (Attorney Laxman Adhikari added to party Gurmej Singh(pty:pet))(Adhikari, Laxman) (Entered: 05/06/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Attorney Civil Case Opening)
#2
May 06, 2026
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Petitioner Gurmej Singh. (Adhikari, Laxman) (Entered: 05/06/2026)
Main Document:
Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71)
#3
May 06, 2026
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Petitioner Gurmej Singh. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Declaration with Exhibits) (Adhikari, Laxman) (Entered: 05/06/2026)
Main Document:
Temporary Restraining Order
#4
May 06, 2026
The Petitioner has voluntarily consented to have a Magistrate Judge conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and entry of judgment. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (mza) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 05/06/2026)
#5
May 06, 2026
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (mza) (Entered: 05/06/2026)
Main Document:
Notice of Assignment to U.S. Magistrate Judge CV-25B optional html form
#6
May 06, 2026
Notice of General Order 26-05 and Briefing Schedule. (mza) (Entered: 05/06/2026)
Main Document:
Notice (Scheduling Order 2241) - optional html form
#7
May 06, 2026
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver: denying 3 Petitioner's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Pursuant to General Order No. 26-05, the Court set an expedited briefing schedule for the petition for writ of habeas corpus in this case. It is not certain that the merits of the TRO motion can be decided before the merits of the habeas petition. Even if there is a delay that results from awarding relief to Petitioner on the merits of the petition, it would be brief. Accordingly, the Court concludes that awarding relief via a TRO is not warranted. See Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 22 (2008). For these reasons, the motion is DENIED. (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) (RAO) (Entered: 05/06/2026)
May 06, 2026
2241 Initial Case Assignment Consent or Declination
May 06, 2026
Temporary Restraining Order
#8
May 13, 2026
Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123)
Main Document:
Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123)
#9
May 13, 2026
Answer to Complaint
Main Document:
Answer to Complaint
#10
May 15, 2026
Reply
Main Document:
Reply
May 20, 2026
Immigration 2241 Full Consent
Parties
Fereti Semaia
Party
Gurmej Singh
Party