Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-03406

#1

May 04, 2026

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against All Respondents and MOTION for IMMEDIATE RELEASE by Eduardo Najera Salgado. (Deputy Clerk AJB) (Entered: 05/06/2026)

May 04, 2026

RECEIPT number 100008053 for $5.00 from Eduardo Najera Salgado. (Deputy Clerk AJB)

#2

May 06, 2026

IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS (Deputy Clerk AJB) (Entered: 05/06/2026)

#3

May 06, 2026

CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 05/06/2026)

May 06, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 2 Immigration New Case Documents served on Eduardo Najera Salgado. (Deputy Clerk AJB)

May 06, 2026

Service by Mail

#4

May 07, 2026

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Chi Soo Kim on 05/07/26 ORDERING that within 7 days, Respondents are directed to file an answer or motion to dismiss; petitioner's reply/traverse or opposition is due within 10 days of the date of service of respondents' filing; a reply to an opposition must be filed within 7 days after the opposition is served. Each party proceeding without counsel shall keep the court informed of the current address at all times while the action is pending with any change filed as a separate document captioned "Notice of Change of Address" and served on other parties. Service of documents at the address of record for a party is fully effective. (Deputy Clerk AJB) (Entered: 05/07/2026)

#5

May 07, 2026

MINUTE ORDER issued by the Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 5/7/2026: The court has reviewed Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 1 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. From these filings, it is unclear whether Petitioner has previously been released from immigration custody, or whether this the challenged detention is Petitioner's first contact with immigration authorities. The court has previously addressed claims where noncitizens were re-detained after being released from immigration custody (see, e.g., Selis Tinoco v. Noem, 1:25-cv-01762-DC-JDP, 2025 WL 3567862 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2025); Labrador-Prato v. Noem, 1:25-cv-01598-DC-SCR, 2025 WL 3458802 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2025); D.L.C. v. Wofford, 1:25-cv-01996-DC-JDP, 2026 WL 25511 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2026)), and where noncitizens were detained by immigration authorities for the first time after having lived in the United States for an extended period of time (See e.g., Alvarez Maciel v. Noem, No. 1:26-cv-01318-DC-CKD, 2026 WL 496948 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2026); Barajas Ortiz v. Chestnut, No. 1:26-cv-01167-DC-SCR, 2026 WL 508419 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2026)). Respondents shall file an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to the 1 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by 12:00 PM on 5/12/2026. In their response, Respondents shall indicate whether Petitioner has previously been released from immigration custody, and shall substantively address whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that materially distinguish it from the applicable court's respective prior orders cited above. Petitioner may file a Reply by 5/26/2026. Finally, the court is contemplating ruling directly on the 1 Petition, with the understanding that the court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); A.R. v. Chestnut, No. 1:26-cv-00551-KES-SAB, 2026 WL 227112, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2026) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). Both parties shall address whether they oppose the court ruling directly on the Petition, to the extent a ruling on the Petition entitles Petitioner to the relief sought in the Petition. The matter is not set for a hearing though the court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS) (Entered: 05/07/2026)

May 07, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: Minute Order, filed at Doc. No. 5, served on Eduardo Najera Salgado. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS)

May 07, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 4 Order served on Eduardo Najera Salgado. (Deputy Clerk AJB)

May 07, 2026

Minute Order AND ~Util - Set Motion and F&R Deadlines/Hearings

May 07, 2026

Service by Mail

#6

May 11, 2026

MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy for Magistrate Judge Chi Soo Kim on 5/11/2026: In light of the 5/7/2026 Minute Order issued by District Judge Coggins, the 5/7/2026 Order (ECF No. 4 ) is WITHDRAWN AND VACATED. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk AW) (Entered: 05/11/2026)

#7

May 11, 2026

OPPOSITION to 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Respondents. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Yu, Jonathan) Modified on 5/12/2026 (KLY). (Entered: 05/11/2026)

May 11, 2026

Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Terminate Deadlines and Hearings

May 11, 2026

Service by Mail

May 11, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 6 Minute Order served on Eduardo Najera Salgado. (Deputy Clerk AW)

#8

May 22, 2026

TRAVERSE/REPLY by Eduardo Najera Salgado. (Deputy Clerk JPX) Modified on 5/29/2026 (KS). (Entered: 05/22/2026)

#9

Jun 04, 2026

Order AND Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case

#10

Jun 04, 2026

Judgment

Jun 04, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 9 Order and 10 Judgment served on Eduardo Najera Salgado. (Deputy Clerk AMW)

Jun 04, 2026

Service by Mail