Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-03382

#1

May 04, 2026

2241 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Warden, California City Correctional Center by Luis Alberto Perez De Jesus. [$5 Filing fee received. Receipt to be docketed 5/6/2026] (Deputy Clerk VLK) (Entered: 05/04/2026)

#2

May 04, 2026

MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Luis Alberto Perez De Jesus. (Deputy Clerk VLK) (Entered: 05/04/2026)

#3

May 04, 2026

IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS (Deputy Clerk VLK) (Entered: 05/04/2026)

#4

May 04, 2026

EO: The court has received and reviewed Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, ECF No. 1 and Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, ECF No. 2 . Pending the court's decision on the Petition, and unless and until the court orders otherwise, the court ORDERS that Respondents shall not transfer Petitioner out of this District. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (noting court's "express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctionsasmay be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction"). Because the motion, ECF No. 2, seeks only an order barring Respondents from transferring Petitioner--which is effectively the same relief provided by this status quo order--the motion is DENIED AS MOOT.The pro se petition--construed liberally to raise an argument that Petitioner is entitled to a bond hearing under Section 1226--appears to present a legal issue addressed by several other district judges, in this court and others. See, e.g., Aguilar Hernandez v. Chestnut, No. 1:26-cv-00709-DJC-AC, 2026 WL 303477 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 4, 2026); Crispin M. C. v. Noem, No. 1:25-cv-01487-KES-HBK (HC), 2026 WL 70553 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 8, 2026). Given the substantial percolation of these issues, the court intends to rule directly on the Petition. See28 U.S.C. §2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require.").On or before May 7, 2026, Respondents are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that render it distinguishable from prior orders such as the ones listed above and justify denying the Petition, or indicate this matter is not substantively distinguishable. Petitioner may file a reply on or before May 11, 2026. This matter is not set for a hearing though the court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary.IT IS SO ORDERED.(JUDGE MICAH W. J. SMITH) (ab) (Entered: 05/04/2026)

May 04, 2026

RECEIPT number 200018774 for $5.00 for Filing Fee from Luis Alberto Perez De Jesus. (Deputy Clerk VLC)

May 04, 2026

Service by Mail

May 04, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: A copy of Dkt. No. 4 Entering Order, was served on Luis Alberto Perez De Jesus at the address of record on May 4, 2026. (Deputy Clerk AB)

May 04, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 3 Immigration New Case Documents served on Luis Alberto Perez De Jesus. (Deputy Clerk VLK)

May 04, 2026

Minute Order AND Order on Motion for TRO AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings