District of New Jersey • 2:26-cv-04937

CHILADO RUIZ v. MULLIN

Active

Case Information

Filed: May 01, 2026
Assigned to: Evelyn Padin
Referred to:
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Active
Last Activity: May 04, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
May 01, 2026
First PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ANJDC-17377261.), filed by MARIO CHILADO RUIZ. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet JS 44, # 2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order to Show Cause, # 3 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Habeas Order)(SANTANA, JOSE) (Entered: 05/01/2026)
Main Document: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
May 01, 2026
TEXT ORDER. Respondents are hereby enjoined from transferring Petitioner from New Jersey pending further Order of the Court. So Ordered by Chief Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 5/1/2026. (jml, ) (Entered: 05/01/2026)
May 01, 2026
Judge Evelyn Padin added. (jml, )
May 01, 2026
Add and Terminate Judges
May 01, 2026
Emergent Immigration Habeas Non-transfer Order
#3
May 02, 2026
TEXT ORDER: Petitioner Mario Chilado Ruiz filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 alleging he is unlawfully detained by immigration authorities under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b), D.E. 1 ("Petition"). It is ORDERED that, if Respondents contest Petitioner's factual allegations and/or contend that Petitioner has a criminal record and/or assert this case is distinguishable from the cases in this district previously addressing § 1225, they shall file an expedited answer to the Petition within five days of the date of entry of this Order, and Petitioner may file a reply within three days of the date of filing of Respondents' expedited answer. If Respondents do not file expedited answer, under this Court's decision in Lomeu v. Soto, No. 25-16589, 2025 WL 2981296, at *9 (D.N.J. Oct. 23, 2025), and other recent decisions in this District interpreting § 1225, including Rivera Zumba v. Bondi, No. 25-14626, 2025 WL 2753496(D.N.J. Sept. 26, 2025) (interpreting § 1225(b)(2)), Rivas Rodriguez v. Rokosky, No. 25-17419, 2025 WL 3485628 (D.N.J. Dec. 3, 2025) (interpreting § 1225(b)(1)), accepting Petitioner's allegations as true, the Court holds Petitioner's mandatory detention under Section 1225(b) is unlawful and further violates his liberty interest protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. If Respondents do not file an expedited answer in opposition, they shall instead release Petitioner within five days of this order and file a written notice of Petitioner's release within three days. If Respondents subsequently detain Petitioner under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), they shall comply with the regulations at 8 C.F.R. § 236.1(c)(8) and (d). So Ordered by Judge Evelyn Padin on 5/2/2026. (bt) (Entered: 05/02/2026)
May 02, 2026
Text Order
#4
May 04, 2026
NOTICE of Appearance by MARGARET ANN MAHONEY on behalf of TODD BLANCHE, TODD LYONS, MARKWAYNE MULLIN, LUIS SOTO (MAHONEY, MARGARET) (Entered: 05/04/2026)
Main Document: Notice of Appearance
#5
May 04, 2026
Letter from Respondents respectfully providing the court with a release update re 3 Text Order,,,,,,,. (MAHONEY, MARGARET) (Entered: 05/04/2026)
Main Document: Letter

Parties

CHILADO RUIZ
Party
MULLIN
Party