Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-03361

#1

May 01, 2026

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Sergio Albarran, Todd Blanche, Christopher Chestnut, Department of Homeland Security, Executive Office for Immigration Review, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Todd Lyons, Markwayne Mullin by Jose Honorio Padilla Delgadillo, Jose Wil Quinteros Ramirez. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-13266541) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Frenzen, Niels) (Entered: 05/01/2026)

#2

May 01, 2026

MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Jose Honorio Padilla Delgadillo, Jose Wil Quinteros Ramirez. (Attachments: # 1 Mandatory TRO Checklist, # 2 LR 231 and LR 142 Atty Declaration, # 3 Memorandum, # 4 Exhibit, # 5 Proposed Order)(Frenzen, Niels) (Entered: 05/01/2026)

#3

May 01, 2026

IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS. (Deputy Clerk CM) (Entered: 05/01/2026)

#4

May 02, 2026

CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 05/02/2026)

#5

May 02, 2026

RESPONSE by Sergio Albarran, Todd Blanche, Christopher Chestnut, Executive Office for Immigration Review, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Todd Lyons, Markwayne Mullin, U.S. Department of Homeland Security to 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus,. Attorney Williams, Jonathan added. (Williams, Jonathan) (Entered: 05/02/2026)

#6

May 03, 2026

RESPONSE by Jose Honorio Padilla Delgadillo, Jose Wil Quinteros Ramirez to 5 Response,. (Frenzen, Niels) (Entered: 05/03/2026)

#7

May 04, 2026

MINUTE ORDER (Text Entry Only) The Court has reviewed the Petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. 1 ) and the related request for emergency injunctive relief (Doc. 2 ). Petitioners (A File Nos: 221-489-319 and 246-061-035) assert they were detained January 21 and 27, 2026, respectively (Doc. 1 at 6-7), more than 3 months ago. They do not explain their delay in seeking a request for a temporary restraining order or why, despite this delay, the Court should treat the situation as an emergency. Thus, the TRO request is untimely, and it is DENIED. Local Rule 231(b).The Court refers the matter to the assigned magistrate judge for a determination on the merits. The Court sets the following briefing schedule, which may be modified by the magistrate judge as needed. Respondents SHALL file their responsive pleading within 14 days. Petitioners may file a traverse no later than 7 days after the respondents file their brief. In the meantime, unless and until the Court orders otherwise, the Court ORDERS that Respondents shall not remove Petitioners from the United States nor transfer Petitioners out of this District. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (noting the court's "express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction"). Given the circumstances, the Court finds that this order is warranted to maintain the status quo pending the hearing and any subsequent order and finds that Petitioners have satisfied the factors governing the issuance of such relief signed by District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on May 4, 2026. (Deputy Clerk IM) (Entered: 05/04/2026)

May 04, 2026

Order on Motion for TRO