Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-03312

(HC) Rodriguez v. Warden of the Golden State Annex Detention Facility

Active

Case Information

Filed: April 30, 2026
Assigned to: Kirk E. Sherriff
Referred to: Frank J. Singer
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 8:1105(a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Active
Last Activity: April 30, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
Apr 30, 2026
2241 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Current or Acting United States Attorney General, Current or Acting Director, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Current or Acting Director, San Francisco Field Office, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Warden of the Golden State Annex Detention Facility, Current or Acting Secretary, United States Department of Homeland Security by Jose O Rodriguez. (Deputy Clerk MR) (Entered: 04/30/2026)
Main Document: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Apr 30, 2026
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Jose O Rodriguez. (Deputy Clerk MR) (Entered: 04/30/2026)
Main Document: In Forma Pauperis
#3
Apr 30, 2026
MOTION to APPOINT COUNSEL by Jose O Rodriguez. (Deputy Clerk MR) (Entered: 04/30/2026)
Main Document: Appoint Counsel
#4
Apr 30, 2026
MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Jose O Rodriguez. (Deputy Clerk MR) (Entered: 04/30/2026)
Main Document: Temporary Restraining Order
#5
Apr 30, 2026
ORDER AUTHORIZING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS as to Jose O Rodriguez signed by Magistrate Judge Frank J. Singer on 4/30/2026. (Deputy Clerk MR) (Entered: 04/30/2026)
Main Document: 05 - HC/Order Authorizing IFP AND Order on Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis
#6
Apr 30, 2026
IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS. (Deputy Clerk MR) (Entered: 04/30/2026)
Main Document: Immigration New Case Documents
#7
Apr 30, 2026
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 04/30/2026)
Main Document: CONSENT/DECLINE
#8
Apr 30, 2026
MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Kirk E. Sherriff on 4/30/2026: (Text Only Entry). The Court has reviewed the 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus and 4 motion for temporary restraining order. The 1 petition appears to raise legal issues that this Court has previously addressed. See e.g., Elmer Joel M. C. v. Wofford, No. 1:25-CV-01622-KES-CDB (HC), 2025 WL 3501200 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2025); Clene C.D. v. Robbins, No. 1:25-CV-01463-KES-SKO (HC), 2026 WL 84302 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2026); W.V.S.M. v. Wofford, No. 1:25-CV-01489-KES-HBK (HC), 2025 WL 3236521 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 19, 2025); Bilal A. v. Wofford, No. 1:25-CV-01715-KES-HBK (HC), 2025 WL 3648366 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 16, 2025); Marina V.N. v. Robbins, No. 1:25-CV-01845-KES-SKO (HC), 2025 WL 3701960 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 21, 2025). The Court intends to rule directly on the 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus, with the understanding that the Court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the 4 motion for temporary restraining order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); Dzhabrailov v. Decker, No. 20-CV-3118 (PMH), 2020 WL 2731966, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. May 26, 2020) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). On or before May 4, 2026, respondents are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that distinguish it from the Court's prior orders in Elmer Joel M. C. v. Wofford, Clene C.D. v. Robbins, W.V.S.M. v. Wofford, Bilal A. v. Wofford, and Marina V.N. v. Robbins and justify denying the petition, or indicate the matter is not substantively distinguishable. Pending the Court's decision, and unless and until the Court orders otherwise, the Court ORDERS that respondents shall not transfer petitioner out of this District. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (noting court's "express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction"). (gm) (Entered: 04/30/2026)
Apr 30, 2026
Minute Order
Apr 30, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 5 Order Authorizing IFP Status, Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis, 6 Immigration New Case Documents served on Jose O Rodriguez. (Deputy Clerk MR)
Apr 30, 2026
Service by Mail

Parties

(HC) Rodriguez
Party
Warden of the Golden State Annex Detention Facility
Party