Western District of Texas • 5:26-cv-02812

#1

Apr 29, 2026

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Jose Luis Velazquez Hernandez. receipt ATXWDC-21848753 (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit, # 4 Exhibit, # 5 Exhibit, # 6 Exhibit)(Rodriguez, Bryan) Modified on 4/29/2026, to edit text (mgr). (Entered: 04/29/2026)

Apr 29, 2026

To be Referred to SA Mag Judge

Apr 29, 2026

Hearing AND Miscellaneous Relief

Apr 29, 2026

MOTION for Oral Argument (found in document 1) re 1 Amended Complaint,, MOTION for Expedited Hearing re 1 Amended Complaint, by Jose Luis Velazquez Hernandez. (mgr)

Apr 29, 2026

If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Bemporad (mgr)

Apr 29, 2026

Case assigned to Judge Xavier Rodriguez. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (mgr)

Apr 29, 2026

Case Assigned/Reassigned

#2

Apr 30, 2026

TEXT ORDER FOR SERVICE of 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. It is ORDERED that notice of electronic filing of 1 Petition and this Order to the United States Attorney in San Antonio, Texas shall constitute service on the Federal Respondents and on all Respondents unless otherwise contested. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Respondents shall file a response to the Petition within seven (7) days of the date of service. The response must identify: (1) Petitioner's alleged country of birth, so that Petitioner can be located in the Online Detainee Locator System; (2) Petitioner's alleged date of entry and statutory basis for removability; (3) any previous immigration detention history, e.g., whether Petitioner has previously been subject to immigration detention and, if so, the approximate date of Petitioner's previous release into the interior; and (4) Petitioner's alleged immigration status, e.g., whether Petitioner has a pending claim for asylum, withholding of removal, or protection under the Convention Against Torture or is subject to a final removal order. Additionally, because this case appears to turn on whether Petitioners detention without a bond hearing violates the due process rights afforded to noncitizens who have established a substantial presence in the United States, Respondents must consider the Courts prior orders addressing this question and note any material factual differences between those cases and this one. E.g., Valencia Reyes v. Noem, No. SA-25-CV-1921-XR, 2026 WL 981034 (W.D. Tex. Feb. 25, 2026); Gonzalez Carrillo v. Bondi, No. SA-26-CV-778-XR, 2026 WL 981037 (W.D. Tex. Feb. 26, 2026). If Respondents so choose, in lieu of a full response, they may instead file a response indicating that there are no material factual differences here and preserving all legal arguments made by the Federal Respondents in those cases. It is FURTHER ORDERED that, if Petitioner elects to file a reply, Petitioner may do so no later than seven days after the Respondents file their answers/responses. (cb) (Entered: 04/30/2026)

Apr 30, 2026

Order on Motion for Hearing AND Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief

Apr 30, 2026

Order

Apr 30, 2026

Text Order DENYING [] Motion for Expedited Hearing; DENYING [] Motion for Hearing entered by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. This Court has received hundreds of habeas corpus petitions in recent months. This Petition will be assessed, and the Court will issue a ruling, in due course. The Court will rule on the briefing in this case unless it determines a hearing is warranted. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (cb)

#3

May 07, 2026

Response

#4

May 15, 2026

Reply to Response to Motion