Northern District of Illinois • 1:25-cv-13726
Flores Martinez v. Noem, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Active
Case Information
Filed: November 07, 2025
Assigned to:
Sara Lee Ellis
Referred to:
—
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Active
Last Activity:
November 14, 2025
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Nov 07, 2025
PETITION for writ of habeas corpus filed by Jose Flores Martinez against Pamela Bondi, U.S. Attorney General, Todd Lyons, Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity, Kristi Noem, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Samuel Olson, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Removal Operations Field Office Director Filing fee $ 5, receipt number AILNDC-24322580. (Attachments: # 1 Supplement TRO, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet, # 3 Supplement 2441 Form)(Bolis, Shady) (Entered: 11/07/2025)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Nov 08, 2025
AMENDED complaint by Jose Flores Martinez against Pamela Bondi, U.S. Attorney General, Todd Lyons, Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity, Kristi Noem, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Samuel Olson, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Removal Operations Field Office Director (Bolis, Shady) (Entered: 11/08/2025)
Main Document:
Amended Complaint
#3
Nov 10, 2025
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: Petitioner has filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition challenging his present detention in ICE custody. Respondents are ordered to respond to the habeas corpus petition by 11/12/25. In addition, Respondents shall make a preliminary filing by 11/12/25 stating: (1) confirmation that Petitioner was located in the Northern District of Illinois at the time this case was filed; (2) the current status of Petitioner's immigration proceedings; (3) Petitioner's current location and proper Respondent based on that location; and (4) the government's view as to whether the recent decision in Castanon Nava v. DHS, No. 18 C 3757 (N.D. Ill) (Dkt. 214) (addressing a consent decree) has any effect on Petitioner's habeas corpus case. Pursuant to the Court's authority under the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651, the Government is ordered not to remove Petitioner from the jurisdiction of the United States and not to transfer him to any federal judicial district other than those in the States of Illinois, Indiana, or Wisconsin. A.A.R.P. v. Trump, 145 S. Ct. 1364, 1369 (2025) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a)) ("[T]he Government represented on the record in federal court that it reserved the right to remove detainees after midnight. We had the power to issue injunctive relief to prevent irreparable harm to the applicants and to preserve our jurisdiction over the matter."); United States v. United Mine Workers of Am., 330 U.S. 258, 293 (1947) ("The District Court had the power to preserve existing conditions while it was determining its own authority to grant injunctive relief.") If the Petitioner is already, as of the posting of this order, located outside of Illinois, Indiana, or Wisconsin but within the United States, or is in the midst of transportation outside of those States to another State, then this bar on transfer does not require the immediate return of the Petitioner as long as Respondents intend to hold Petitioner within the United States. Instead, the parties and the Court will address the issue after the Respondents make the preliminary filing. The Clerk shall email a copy of this order to Tom Walsh, Chief of the Civil Division, United States Attorney's Office, Northern District of Illinois, Craig Oswald, AUSA, United States Attorney's Office, Northern District of Illinois, and Joshua Press, AUSA, United States Attorney's Office, Northern District of Illinois. This case is set for an in-person status hearing on 11/13/25 at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom 1403. Emailed notice (cn). (Entered: 11/10/2025)
Main Document:
MINUTE
#4
Nov 10, 2025
Order
Main Document:
Order
#5
Nov 10, 2025
attorney designation
Main Document:
attorney designation
#6
Nov 10, 2025
attorney designation
Main Document:
attorney designation
Nov 10, 2025
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sara L. Ellis. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeannice W. Appenteng. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category Two). (lw, )
Nov 10, 2025
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (lw, )
Nov 10, 2025
case assigned
Nov 10, 2025
clerk's notice
Nov 10, 2025
mailed
Nov 10, 2025
EMAILED Minute Order 3 to joshua.press_usdoj.gov <joshua.press@usdoj.gov>; Oswald, Craig (USAILN) <craig.oswald@usdoj.gov>; and Tom Walsh (Thomas.Walsh2@usdoj.gov) <thomas.walsh2@usdoj.gov> (cn, )
#7
Nov 13, 2025
in court hearing
Main Document:
in court hearing
#11
Nov 14, 2025
In Court Hearing Held AND Order AND Order on Motion for Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case
#12
Nov 14, 2025
Judgment - AO450
Main Document:
Judgment - AO450
Parties
Party
Party
Party
Attorney
Firm