District of Arizona • 2:26-cv-02910

#1

Apr 27, 2026

PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Fed/2241). Filing fee received: $ 5.00, receipt number AAZDC-25528466 filed by Nashwan Naji Dawod Ghaleb. (Belous, Laura) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibits, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet)(KLG) (Entered: 04/27/2026)

#2

Apr 27, 2026

SUMMONS Submitted by Nashwan Naji Dawod Ghaleb. (Belous, Laura) (KLG) (Entered: 04/27/2026)

#3

Apr 27, 2026

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (Attachments: # 1 Instructions) (KLG) (Entered: 04/27/2026)

#4

Apr 28, 2026

ORDER - Counsel for Petitioner must immediately serve the Petition (Doc. 1 ) and a copy of this Order on Respondents. The Clerk must issue any properly completed summonses. The Clerk must immediately transmit by email a copy of this Order and the Petition to AUSA Melissa Kroeger, Lon Leavitt, Theo Nickerson, Dina Anagnopoulos, and Mary Finlon. Respondents must show cause no later than 5/5/26, why the Petition should not be granted. Petitioner may file a reply no later than 5/7/26. Signed by Judge Krissa M Lanham on 4/27/26. (DXD) (Entered: 04/28/2026)

#5

Apr 28, 2026

Summons Issued as to Todd Blanche, John E Cantu, Todd M Lyons, Markwayne Mullin, Eric Rokosky, and U.S. Attorney. (DXD) (Entered: 04/28/2026)

#6

May 04, 2026

Notice (Other)

#7

May 05, 2026

Notice of Appearance/Association of Counsel

#8

May 05, 2026

Extension of Time

#9

May 06, 2026

ORDER granting 8 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond. IT IS ORDERED that Respondents deadline is extended to May 6, 2026. Petitioner's reply due May 8, 2026. Ordered by Judge Krissa M Lanham on 5/6/2026. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (NSH) (Entered: 05/06/2026)

#10

May 06, 2026

Response to Habeas Petition (Fed/2241)

May 06, 2026

Order on Motion for Extension of Time

#11

May 08, 2026

Reply to Response to Habeas Petition (Fed/2241)

#12

May 11, 2026

Service Executed

#13

May 27, 2026

Notice of Appearance/Association of Counsel

#14

Jun 24, 2026

Notice (Other)

#15

Aug 21, 2026

Notice (Other)

#16

Aug 26, 2026

Notice of Filing - Amended Pleading (LRCiv 15.1(b))

#17

Aug 26, 2026

Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Fed/2241)

#18

Sep 01, 2026

ORDER - Respondents shall respond to the amended petition (Doc. 17 ) no later than September 15, 2026. Petitioner may file a reply no later than September 22, 2026. Ordered by Judge Krissa M Lanham on 9/1/2026. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (NSH) (Entered: 09/01/2026)

Sep 01, 2026

Order

#19

Sep 09, 2026

Response to Amended Habeas Petition (Fed/2241)

#20

Sep 17, 2026

Reply to Response to Amended Habeas Petition (Fed/2241)

#21

Sep 25, 2026

ORDER - Petitioner filed an amended petition for writ of habeas corpus challenging his immigration detention. (Doc. 17 .) The court ordered respondents to respond to the amended petition (Doc. 18 ), and that response stands on respondents' original filing (Doc. 19 ). Respondents' original filing notes petitioner is detained under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(1)(B)(ii), persons detained under that statute have no "protected liberty interest in freedom from detention because they are required to be detained by statute," and they have no "substantive due process right to a bond hearing" based on the Nation's history and tradition. (Doc. 10 at 2, 4, 6-7 (citing Dep't of Homeland Sec. v. Thuraissigiam, 591 U.S. 103 (2020)).) The Ninth Circuit recently held that Thuraissigiam allows aliens detained under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(1)(B)(ii) to pursue due process challenges and interpreted Thuraissigiam to be "an admission, not a detention, case." Padilla v. United States Immigr. & Customs Enf't, --- F.4th ----, 2026 WL 2822044, at *11, *19 (9th Cir. Sept. 21, 2026). Based on a historical analysis, Padilla further described the "freedom from arbitrary imprisonment" as occupying "a central place" in our constitutional order and constrained by "the widespread availability of bail as well as judicial review of the legality of confinement," with "noncitizens and citizens alike [being] able to use these mechanisms to obtain release from detention." Id. at 18. In light of Padilla, IT IS ORDERED within seven days respondents must file a supplemental response of no more than ten pages addressing whether petitioner is entitled to release or a bond hearing. Petitioner may file a response to the supplemental briefing, of no more than ten pages, within seven days of when that briefing is filed. Ordered by Judge Krissa M Lanham on 9/25/2026. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (NSH) (Entered: 09/25/2026)

Sep 25, 2026

Order

#22

Oct 02, 2026

Brief - Response

#23

Oct 08, 2026

Response