Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-03151

(HC) Chi v. Wofford

Active

Case Information

Filed: April 24, 2026
Assigned to: Dena M. Coggins
Referred to: Chi Soo Kim
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 8:1105(a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Active
Last Activity: April 30, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
Apr 24, 2026
PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Respondents by Rongzhi Chi. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-13233601) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit)(Chan, Connie) (Entered: 04/24/2026)
Main Document: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Apr 24, 2026
MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Rongzhi Chi. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum, # 2 Declaration, # 3 Exhibit, # 4 Proposed Order)(Chan, Connie) (Entered: 04/24/2026)
Main Document: Temporary Restraining Order
#3
Apr 24, 2026
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 5/29/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Litigant Letter) (Deputy Clerk MCF) (Entered: 04/24/2026)
Main Document: Prisoner New Case Documents for DJ Presider
#4
Apr 24, 2026
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 04/24/2026)
Main Document: CONSENT/DECLINE
#5
Apr 26, 2026
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 04/26/2026)
Main Document: CONSENT/DECLINE
#6
Apr 27, 2026
MINUTE ORDER issued by the Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 4/27/2026: The court has reviewed Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. The court has previously addressed the legal issues raised by Count One of the Petition. See, e.g., Hoac v. Becerra, No. 2:25-cv-01740-DC-JDP, 2025 WL 1993771 (E.D. Cal. July 16, 2025), Vuong v. Becerra, 1:25-cv-01847-DC-CSK, 2025 WL 3707172 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2025), and El-Ghazaly v. Chestnut, 1:25-cv-01621-DC-CKD, 2025 WL 3485030 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 4, 2025). The court is contemplating ruling directly on the 1 Petition, with the understanding that the court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); A.R. v. Chestnut, No. 1:26-cv-00551-KES-SAB, 2026 WL 227112, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2026) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). Respondents shall file an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to the 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by 12:00 PM on 4/29/2026. In their response, Respondents shall substantively address whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that materially distinguish it from the court's prior orders listed above. Petitioner may file a Reply by 12:00 PM on 4/30/2026. Both parties should address whether they oppose the court ruling directly on the Petition, albeit as to Count One only, to the extent a ruling on that Count entitles Petitioner to the relief sought in the Petition. The matter is not set for a hearing though the court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS) (Entered: 04/27/2026)
Apr 27, 2026
Minute Order AND ~Util - Set Motion and F&R Deadlines/Hearings
#8
Apr 29, 2026
RETURN to 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and OPPOSITION to 2 Injunctive Relief filed by Sergio Albarran, Todd Blanche, Todd M. Lyons, Markwayne Mullin, and Minga Wofford. (Andrews, Anthony) (Modified on 4/30/2026 by CRS.) (Entered: 04/29/2026)
Main Document: RETURN
#9
Apr 29, 2026
TRAVERSE filed by Rongzhi Chi. (Chan, Connie) (Docket Text Modified on 4/30/2026 by CRS.) (Entered: 04/29/2026)
Main Document: TRAVERSE
#10
Apr 30, 2026
MINUTE ORDER issued by the Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 4/30/2026: In Respondents' 8 Opposition to Petitioner's 2 Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order, Respondents continue to oppose issuance of a Temporary Restraining Order. However, Respondents do not identify any material distinction between this case and the court's previous decisions in Hoac v. Becerra, No. 2:25-cv-01740-DC-JDP, 2025 WL 1993771 (E.D. Cal. July 16, 2025), Vuong v. Becerra, 1:25-cv-01847-DC-CSK, 2025 WL 3707172 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2025), and El-Ghazaly v. Chestnut, 1:25-cv-01621-DC-CKD, 2025 WL 3485030 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 4, 2025), and other cases addressing the same issue presented here. Accordingly, pursuant to the court's reasoning in Hoac, Vuong, and El-Ghazaly, Petitioner's 2 Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order is GRANTED, and the court ORDERS the following: (1) Petitioner Rongzhi Chi (A- 206-592-174) shall be RELEASED IMMEDIATELY from the Respondents' custody; and (2) Respondents are ENJOINED and RESTRAINED from re-arresting or re-detaining Petitioner absent compliance with constitutional protections, which include, at a minimum, strict compliance with the requirements of 8 C.F.R. § 241.13(i). Moreover, in light of Respondents' non-opposition to treating Petitioner's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order as a Motion for Preliminary Injunction (see Doc. No. 8), and given that the standard for issuing a Temporary Restraining Order is "substantially identical" to the standard for issuing a Preliminary Injunction, Stuhlbarg Int'l Sales Co. v. John D. Brush & Co., 240 F.3d 832, 839 n.7 (9th Cir. 2001), the court hereby ISSUES a Preliminary Injunction on the same terms. Upon further review, the court will not rule directly on the Petition at this time. Therefore, this case is REFERRED to the assigned Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to serve a copy of this Order on the Mesa Verde Detention Facility. (Text Only Entry) (ICE - Mesa Verde) (Deputy Clerk CRS) (Entered: 04/30/2026)
Apr 30, 2026
Minute Order AND Order on Motion for TRO AND ~Util - 1 Terminate Deadlines and Hearings