District of Massachusetts • 1:25-cv-13296

Alcantara Lugo v. Hyde

Terminated

Case Information

Filed: November 05, 2025
Assigned to: Richard Gaylore Stearns
Referred to:
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Terminated: December 30, 2025
Last Activity: December 30, 2025
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
Nov 05, 2025
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number AMADC-11342971 Fee status: Filing Fee paid., filed by Yensi Alcantara Lugo, Mario Da Conceica Antonio, Edu De Azevedo Reis, Kelvilyn De Pinho Cilira, Jackson Mayaguari Palta, Mario Palacios Ramirez, Raul Pallo Chugchilan, Harlin Quinonez Perez. (Attachments: # 1 Category Form Category Form, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Ciachurski, Julia) (Entered: 11/05/2025)
Main Document: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241
#2
Nov 06, 2025
ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Richard G. Stearns assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley. (CM) (Entered: 11/06/2025)
#3
Nov 06, 2025
Order
Main Document: Order
#4
Nov 06, 2025
Copy re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) and 3 Order mailed to Patricia Hyde, Todd M Lyons, Kristi L. Noem and Antone Moniz on 11/6/2025. (JAM) (Entered: 11/06/2025)
Nov 06, 2025
Copy Mailed
Nov 06, 2025
Notice of Case Assignment
#5
Nov 07, 2025
Notice of Voluntary Dismissal
Main Document: Notice of Voluntary Dismissal
#6
Nov 12, 2025
Notice of Appearance
Main Document: Notice of Appearance
#7
Nov 17, 2025
Sever
Main Document: Sever
#8
Nov 17, 2025
Answer/Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241
Main Document: Answer/Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241
#9
Nov 18, 2025
Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered re 8 Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241, filed by Kristi L. Noem, Patricia Hyde, Todd Lyons, Antone Moniz. Treated as a motion to dismiss and ALLOWED. Petitioners Yensi Alacantara Lugo, Harlin Quinonez Perez, Raul Pallo Chugchilan, Mario Palacios Ramirez, and Edu De Azevedo Reis filed a joint Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus challenging each of their immigration detentions and seeking their immediate release or a bond hearing for each Petitioner. The Joint Petition reflects each habeas petitioner's situation is unique and factually distinct and may not be amenable to a generalized application of the law. See Pet. (Dkt #1) at paras. 20-35. The government contends that multi-petitioner joint habeas petitions are improper vehicles for individual petitioners to raise their claim of unlawful detention and asks the court to dismiss the petitioners. This court agrees.As the government sets out (along with numerous cited cases), the federal habeas statute, with its minimal filing fee, is designed for an individual petitioner. It requires that an application for a writ of habeas corpus "be in writing signed and verified by the person for whose relief it is intended or by someone acting in his behalf" and "shall allege the facts concerning the applicant's commitment or detention, the name of the person who has custody over him and by virtue of what claim or authority, if known." 28 U.S.C. § 2242 (emphasis added). The issuance of the writ is then "directed to the person having custody of the person detained" and may require the custodian to "produce at the hearing the body of the person detained." Id. § 2243. Therefore, petitioners Yensi Alacantara Lugo, Harlin Quinonez Perez, Raul Pallo Chugchilan, Mario Palacios Ramirez, and Edu De Azevedo Reis are dismissed from this case. The court will provide a STAY of their dismissal, providing counsel time to file an individual petition for each of these petitioners. Dismissal for these petitioners will enter at close of business on Thursday afternoon at 5:00 p.m.(MZ) (Entered: 11/18/2025)
#10
Nov 18, 2025
Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered finding as moot 7 Motion to Sever, as petitioners Jackson Mayaguari Palta and Mario Da Conceicao Antonio are the only remaining petitioners in this case once dismissal enters as to the others (Yensi Alacantara Lugo, Harlin Quinonez Perez, Raul Pallo Chugchilan, Mario Palacios Ramirez, and Edu De Azevedo Reis) on Thursday at 5:00 p.m. (MZ) (Entered: 11/18/2025)
#11
Nov 18, 2025
Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered re 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Petitions by Jackson Mayaguari Palta and Mario Da Conceicao Antonio filed by Kristi L. Noem, Patricia Hyde, Todd Lyons, Antone Moniz. Respondents' request for an extension of time until November 21, 2025, to respond to Jackson Mayaguari Palta and Mario Da Conceicao Antonios habeas petition is ALLOWED.(MZ) (Entered: 11/18/2025)
Nov 18, 2025
Order
Nov 18, 2025
Order on Motion to Sever
#12
Nov 20, 2025
Notice of Voluntary Dismissal
Main Document: Notice of Voluntary Dismissal
#13
Nov 21, 2025
Answer/Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241
Main Document: Answer/Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241
#14
Dec 03, 2025
Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered re 13 Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241.Although petitioner has been in the country for several years, it appears that he was initially detained shortly after his entry into the United States and only released on parole. Because the provision under which he was released states that, after parole expires (as it has done here), "the alien shall forthwith return or be returned to the custody from which he was paroled and thereafter his case shall continue to be dealt with in the same manner as that of any other applicant for admission to the United States," 8 U.S.C. § 1182(d)(5), and 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(1) mandates the detention of applicants for admission, petitioner shall show cause by December 15, 2025, why this case should not be dismissed.(RGS, law3) (Entered: 12/03/2025)
Dec 03, 2025
Order
#15
Dec 15, 2025
Response to Order to Show Cause
Main Document: Response to Order to Show Cause
#16
Dec 16, 2025
Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. Based on the plain language of the warrant, the Government purported to arrest petitioner pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) rather than 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(1). His detention thus is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a). The court orders that ICE facilitate a bond hearing for petitioner before an Immigration Judge (with the standards outlined in Hernandez-Lara v. Lyons, 10 F.4th 19 (1st Cir. 2021)), as soon as practicable (but in no cases more than ten (10) days from the date of this Order). Petitioner is to remain in this District until the appropriate court determines whether he is eligible for release on bond while contesting any removal proceedings. (RGS, law3) (Entered: 12/16/2025)
Dec 16, 2025
Order
#17
Dec 30, 2025
Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered re 16 Order for Bond hearing. The only remaining petitioner in this case, Mario Da Conceica Antonio, was ordered a bond hearing no later than December 26, 2025. His counsel reports that Mr. Antonio was granted bond on December 22, 2025, and released from ICE detention yesterday. Accordingly, the Clerk can dismiss and close this case. (MZ) (Entered: 12/30/2025)
#18
Dec 30, 2025
Judge Richard G. Stearns: ORDER entered. ORDER DISMISSING CASE. (JAM) (Entered: 12/30/2025)
Main Document: Order Dismissing Case
Dec 30, 2025
Order