Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-03012
(HC) Torres Morales v. Warden, California City Correctional Center
Completed
Case Information
Filed: April 21, 2026
Assigned to:
Dena M. Coggins
Referred to:
Chi Soo Kim
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
8:1105(a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Completed: April 29, 2026
Last Activity:
April 29, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Apr 21, 2026
PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Warden, California City Correctional Center by Vicente Torres Morales. (REMARK: $5.00 Filing Fee Received. Receipt to be docketed 04/22/26) (Deputy Clerk AJB) (Entered: 04/21/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Apr 21, 2026
MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Vicente Torres Morales. (Deputy Clerk AJB) (Entered: 04/21/2026)
Main Document:
Temporary Restraining Order
#3
Apr 21, 2026
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 5/26/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Litigant Letter) (Deputy Clerk AJB) (Entered: 04/21/2026)
Main Document:
Prisoner New Case Documents for DJ Presider
#4
Apr 21, 2026
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 04/21/2026)
Main Document:
CONSENT/DECLINE
Apr 21, 2026
Service by Mail
Apr 21, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 3 Prisoner New Case Documents served on Vicente Torres Morales. (Deputy Clerk AJB)
#5
Apr 22, 2026
MINUTE ORDER issued by the Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 4/22/2026: The court has reviewed Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 2 Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order. In that Motion, Petitioner states he was detained on 8/26/2025, over 240 days before filing that Motion. Petitioner does not explain why he did not seek injunctive relief sooner. Notably, Local Rule 231(b) states: "In considering a motion for a temporary restraining order, the Court will consider whether the applicant could have sought relief by motion for preliminary injunction at an earlier date without the necessity for seeking last-minute relief by motion for temporary restraining order." Because Petitioner's 2 Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order is untimely, the court will CONVERT that Motion to a 2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Further, the court has previously addressed the legal issues raised by Count One of the Petition. See e.g., Alvarez Maciel v. Noem, No. 1:26-cv-01318-DC-CKD, 2026 WL 496948 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2026), and Barajas Ortiz v. Chestnut, No. 1:26-cv-01167-DC-SCR, 2026 WL 508419 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2026). The court is contemplating ruling directly on the 1 Petition, with the understanding that the court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); A.R. v. Chestnut, No. 1:26-cv-00551-KES-SAB, 2026 WL 227112, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2026) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). Respondents shall file an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to the 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by 12:00 PM on 4/24/2026. In their response, Respondents shall substantively address whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that materially distinguish it from the court's prior orders listed above. Petitioner may file a Reply by 5/8/2026. Both parties should address whether they oppose the court ruling directly on the Petition, albeit as to Count One only, to the extent a ruling on that Count entitles Petitioner to the relief sought in the Petition. The matter is not set for a hearing though the court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS) (Entered: 04/22/2026)
Apr 22, 2026
RECEIPT number 200018566 for $5.00 for filing fee from Vicente Torres Morales. (Deputy Clerk VLK)
Apr 22, 2026
Minute Order AND ~Util - Set Motion and F&R Deadlines/Hearings
Apr 22, 2026
Service by Mail
Apr 22, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: Minute Order, filed at Doc. No. 5, served on Vicente Torres Morales. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS)
#6
Apr 23, 2026
OPPOSITION by Respondent Warden, California City Correctional Center. (Hemesath, Audrey) (Entered: 04/23/2026)
Main Document:
OPPOSITION
#7
Apr 29, 2026
Order AND Order on Motion for TRO AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case
#8
Apr 29, 2026
Judgment
Main Document:
Judgment
Apr 29, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 7 Order, 8 Judgment served on Vicente Torres Morales. (Deputy Clerk HAH)
Apr 29, 2026
Service by Mail
Parties
(HC) Torres Morales
Party
Warden, California City Correctional Center
Party