Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-02923

#2

Apr 17, 2026

MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Sixto Morales Espinoza. (Deputy Clerk VLK) (Entered: 04/20/2026)

#3

Apr 17, 2026

MOTION to APPOINT COUNSEL by Sixto Morales Espinoza. (Deputy Clerk VLK) (Entered: 04/20/2026)

#4

Apr 17, 2026

DECLARATION in support of 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, 3 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Deputy Clerk VLK) (Entered: 04/20/2026)

#1

Apr 20, 2026

2241 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Warden, California City Correctional Center by Sixto Morales Espinoza. (Deputy Clerk VLK) (Entered: 04/20/2026)

#5

Apr 20, 2026

PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 5/26/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Litigant Letter) (Deputy Clerk VLK) (Entered: 04/20/2026)

#6

Apr 20, 2026

CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 04/20/2026)

#7

Apr 20, 2026

MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 4/20/2026:The court has reviewed Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. The court has previously addressed the legal issues raised by Petitioner's claim. See e.g., Alvarez Maciel v. Noem, No. 1:26-cv-01318-DC-CKD, 2026 WL 496948 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2026), and Barajas Ortiz v. Chestnut, No. 1:26-cv-01167-DC-SCR, 2026 WL 508419 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2026). The court is contemplating ruling directly on the 1 Petition, with the understanding that the court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); A.R. v. Chestnut, No. 1:26-cv-00551-KES-SAB, 2026 WL 227112, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2026) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). Respondents shall file an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to the 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by 12:00 PM on 4/23/2026. In their response, Respondents shall substantively address whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that materially distinguish it from the court's prior orders listed above. Petitioner may file a Reply by 5/7/2026. Both parties should address whether they oppose the court ruling directly on the Petition. The matter is not set for a hearing though the court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk JRW) (Entered: 04/20/2026)

Apr 20, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 5 Prisoner New Case Documents served on Sixto Morales Espinoza. (Deputy Clerk VLK)

Apr 20, 2026

Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings

Apr 20, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 7 Minute Order served on Sixto Morales Espinoza. (Deputy Clerk JRW)

Apr 20, 2026

Service by Mail

#8

Apr 21, 2026

OPPOSITION to 1 Petition, Preliminary Injunction, and 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by Respondent Warden, California City Correctional Center. (Hemesath, Audrey) Modified on 4/22/2026 (HAH). (Entered: 04/21/2026)

#9

Apr 21, 2026

[DISREGARD - Filed in Wrong Case] OPPOSITION by Respondent Warden, California City Correctional Center. (Hemesath, Audrey) Modified on 4/22/2026 (HAH). (Entered: 04/21/2026)

#10

Apr 27, 2026

Order AND Order on Motion for TRO AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case

#11

Apr 27, 2026

Judgment

Apr 27, 2026

Service by Mail

Apr 27, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 10 Order, 11 Judgment served on Sixto Morales Espinoza. (Deputy Clerk JAW)

#12

Apr 30, 2026

CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Deputy Clerk RRB) (Entered: 05/01/2026)