District of New Jersey • 2:26-cv-04132

#1

Apr 18, 2026

Emergency PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ANJDC-17323718.), filed by JOSE ADAN BETETA BETETA. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Text of Proposed Order, # 3 Exhibit A, # 4 Exhibit B, # 5 Exhibit C)(MONTERO, FRANKLIN) (Entered: 04/18/2026)

#2

Apr 18, 2026

Emergency MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by JOSE ADAN BETETA BETETA. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(MONTERO, FRANKLIN) (Entered: 04/18/2026)

#3

Apr 18, 2026

TEXT ORDER. Respondents are hereby enjoined from transferring Petitioner from New Jersey pending further Order of the Court. So Ordered by Chief Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 4/18/2026. (jml, ) (Entered: 04/18/2026)

Apr 18, 2026

Emergent Immigration Habeas Non-transfer Order

Apr 18, 2026

Judge Brian R. Martinotti added. (jml, )

Apr 18, 2026

Add and Terminate Judges

#4

Apr 20, 2026

TEXT ORDER: Before the Court is Petitioner Jose Adan Beteta Beteta's ("Petitioner") Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ("Petition") pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, challenging his continued detention by immigration authorities without an individualized bond hearing (ECF No. 1) and a Motion for Temporary Restraining Order ("TRO") (ECF No. 2). Petitioner, a native of Mexico, entered the United States without inspection in August 2013. (See generally id.) Petitioner contends that he is unlawfully detained under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2)(A) and is entitled to release or a bond hearing under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a). (See id.) Based on this Court's statutory interpretation in Sandhu v. Tsoukaris, No. 25-14607 (BRM) (D.N.J. November 20, 2025), the Court finds the facts asserted in the Petition establish that Petitioner cannot be mandatorily detained under § 1225(b)(2) as he has resided in the United States for several years after entry without admission or parole, and his continued detention under that statute is unlawful. Although Respondents may have been able to lawfully detain Petitioner under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), they instead detained him under § 1225(b)(2) and have still failed to provide Petitioner with the individualized bond hearing that he is entitled to. The Court will not correct Respondents' unlawful application of § 1225(b)(2) and detention of Petitioner by converting Petitioner's detention to a "potentially lawful alternate form under a different statute with different procedural requirements and rules." Fajardo-Nugra v. Soto, No. 26-975, 2026 WL 579192, at *2 (D.N.J. Mar. 2, 2026) (granting Petitioner's habeas petition and ordering Petitioner's release based on the Government's flawed application of § 1225(b)(2).) Accordingly, it is ORDERED that, subject to the following, Petitioner's Petition is GRANTED and Respondents shall RELEASE Petitioner within twenty-four (24) hours of the entry of this Text Order, under the same conditions, if any, that existed prior to his detention. It is further ORDERED that Respondents shall return to Petitioner all personal property belonging to Petitioner - including but not limited to, any driver's license, passport, immigration documents, currency, or cellphone - that was seized at the time of detention. It is further ORDERED that Respondents are permanently enjoined from detaining Petitioner under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2) which the Court has found in inapplicable to him. And it is further ORDERED that Respondents shall not arrest, detain, or otherwise take Petitioner into custody under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) for a period of 14 days following his release, so as to ensure full effectuation of this Court's judgment and to prevent circumvention of the relief granted. It is further ORDERED that Petitioner's TRO Motion (ECF No. 2) is DISMISSED as moot. It is finally ORDERED that if Respondents contend that this matter is factually distinguishable from Sandhu, they shall file an expedited answer to the Petition within three (3) days of the date of this Text Order, and Petitioner may file a reply within three (3) days of receipt of the expedited answer. So Ordered by Judge Brian R. Martinotti on 04/20/2026. (lr, ) (Entered: 04/20/2026)

#5

Apr 20, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance by ALEXANDER JUDKA on behalf of ERIC ROKOSKY, TODD BLANCHE, MARCOS CHARLES, TODD M LYONS, KRISTI NOEM (JUDKA, ALEXANDER) (Entered: 04/20/2026)

Apr 20, 2026

Text Order

#6

Apr 22, 2026

Enforce Judgment

#7

Apr 22, 2026

Letter

#8

Apr 23, 2026

TEXT ORDER: Before the Court is Petitioner's Motion to Enforce Judgment. (ECF No. 6.) On April 20, 2026, the Court ordered Respondents to release Petitioner from custody. (See ECF No. 4.) However, the Court also ordered that if Respondents contend that his matter is factually distinguishable from previous matters decided by the Court, they shall file an expedited answer within three (3) days. (See id.) Respondents have informed the Court that an answer will be filed today. (ECF No. 7.) As such, Petitioner's Motion to Enforce Judgment (ECF No. 6) is DENIED without prejudice. So Ordered by Judge Brian R. Martinotti on 04/23/2026. (lr, ) (Entered: 04/23/2026)

#9

Apr 23, 2026

Response to Habeas Petition

#10

Apr 23, 2026

Brief

Apr 23, 2026

Text Order

#11

Apr 29, 2026

Opinion

#12

Apr 29, 2026

Order

Apr 29, 2026

Terminate Civil Case