Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-02789
(HC) Gallardo Flores v. Warden California City Detention Facility
Completed
Case Information
Filed: April 13, 2026
Assigned to:
Dena M. Coggins
Referred to:
Allison Claire
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
8:1105(a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Completed: July 30, 2026
Last Activity:
October 06, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Apr 13, 2026
2241 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Warden California City Detention Facility by Mariano Gallardo Flores. (Filing fee $ 5, receipted 4/14/2026) (Deputy Clerk RRB) (Entered: 04/14/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Apr 13, 2026
RECEIPT number 200018383 for $5.00 for Mariano Gallardo Flores from Cal City Immigration. (Deputy Clerk LMS)
#2
Apr 14, 2026
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 5/18/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Litigant Letter) (Deputy Clerk RRB) (Entered: 04/14/2026)
Main Document:
Prisoner New Case Documents for DJ Presider
#3
Apr 14, 2026
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 04/14/2026)
Main Document:
CONSENT/DECLINE
Apr 14, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 2 Prisoner New Case Documents served on Mariano Gallardo Flores. (Deputy Clerk RRB)
Apr 14, 2026
Service by Mail
#4
Apr 15, 2026
MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy for Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 04/15/2026. Petitioner, Mariano Gallardo Flores (A# 201-066-803), a self-represented immigration detainee, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 1 ) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, along with the filing fee. Because petitioner may be entitled to the requested relief if the claimed violations are proved, respondents will be served with the § 2241 petition and directed to show cause why the writ should not be granted by filing an answer/return. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order together with a copy of petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 on the United States Attorney. Respondents are directed to file an answer/return within 14 days from the date of this order. If respondents dispute any factual representations in the operative petition, they shall include with the answer/return any and all documents necessary to support their view of the facts. Petitioner's reply/traverse, if any, is due within 7 days of being served a copy of the respondents' answer/return. Respondents shall NOT TRANSFER petitioner outside of this judicial district, pending further order of the court. See 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) (establishing the All Writs Act which empowers the federal courts to "issue all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of their respective jurisdictions...."); see also F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (emphasizing that federal courts have the power to "to preserve the court's jurisdiction or maintain the status quo by injunction pending review of an agency's action"). (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk JAA) (Entered: 04/15/2026)
Apr 15, 2026
Service by Mail
Apr 15, 2026
Minute Order
Apr 15, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 4 Minute Order served on Mariano Gallardo Flores. (Deputy Clerk JAA)
#5
Apr 27, 2026
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Deputy Clerk VLK) (Entered: 04/28/2026)
Main Document:
CONSENT/DECLINE
#6
Apr 28, 2026
ANSWER to PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Warden California City Detention Facility. (Black, Lauren) (Entered: 04/28/2026)
Main Document:
Answer to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#7
May 05, 2026
DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Attorney Haddy Abouzeid, GOVT added for Warden, California City Detention Facility. Attorney Lauren Black, GOVT terminated. (Abouzeid, Haddy) (Entered: 05/05/2026)
Main Document:
DESIGNATION
#8
Jun 07, 2026
DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Robert Anthony Fuentes for Warden, California City Detention Facility, attorney Haddy Abouzeid, GOVT terminated (Abouzeid, Haddy) (Entered: 06/07/2026)
Main Document:
DESIGNATION
#9
Jun 11, 2026
TRAVERSE/REPLY by Mariano Gallardo Flores. (Deputy Clerk OML) Modified on 6/18/2026 (KS). (Entered: 06/15/2026)
Main Document:
TRAVERSE/REPLY
#10
Jul 07, 2026
DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Quinn Disparte, GOVT for Warden, California City Detention Facility, attorney Robert Anthony Fuentes terminated (Disparte, Quinn) (Entered: 07/07/2026)
Main Document:
DESIGNATION
#11
Jul 08, 2026
EMERGENCY MOTION for IMMEDIATE RULING and IMMEDIATE MEDICAL RELIEF by Mariano Gallardo Flores. (Deputy Clerk AMW) (Entered: 07/09/2026)
Main Document:
Miscellaneous Relief
#12
Jul 15, 2026
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/14/2026 RECOMMENDING that the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be granted, that Respondent immediately release petitioner from custody and judgment be entered in Petitioner's favor. Referred to Judge Dena Coggins. Objections due within 3 days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations. (Deputy Clerk VLK) (Entered: 07/15/2026)
#13
Jul 15, 2026
OBJECTIONS to 12 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS by Respondent Warden, California City Detention Facility. (Disparte, Quinn) (Entered: 07/15/2026)
Main Document:
Objections to Findings and Recommendations
Jul 15, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 12 Findings and Recommendations served on Mariano Gallardo Flores. (Deputy Clerk VLK)
Jul 15, 2026
Service by Mail
#14
Jul 30, 2026
ORDER signed by District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 7/29/2026 ADOPTING the findings and recommendations in part; GRANTING Petitioner Mariano Gallardo Flores's (A# 201-066-803) 1 petition on procedural due process grounds as follows: Within 7 days of this order, Respondent is ORDERED to provide Petitioner with a bond hearing before an immigration judge where Respondent bears the burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that Petitioner poses a danger to the community or a risk of flight to justify his continued detention; DENYING Petitioner's 11 request is DENIED as having been rendered moot by this order. (cc ICE California City) CASE CLOSED (Deputy Clerk RRB) (Entered: 07/30/2026)
#15
Jul 30, 2026
JUDGMENT dated *7/30/2026* pursuant to order signed by District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 7/29/2026. (Deputy Clerk RRB) (Entered: 07/30/2026)
Main Document:
Judgment
Jul 30, 2026
Service by Mail
Jul 30, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 14 Order & 15 Judgment served on Mariano Gallardo Flores. (Deputy Clerk RRB)
#17
Aug 17, 2026
MOTION for RECONSIDERATION by Mariano Gallardo Flores. [Filed pursuant to 9/1/2026 Minute Order issued in 1:26-cv-06518-DC-AC] (Deputy Clerk HAH) (Entered: 09/01/2026)
Main Document:
Reconsideration
#16
Aug 20, 2026
MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 8/20/2026: The Court ORDERS that this case be related to case no. 1:26-cv-06518-DC-AC. [TEXT ONLY ENTRY] (Deputy Clerk GJM) (Entered: 08/20/2026)
Aug 20, 2026
Service by Mail
Aug 20, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 16 Minute Order served on Mariano Gallardo Flores. (Deputy Clerk GJM)
Aug 20, 2026
Minute Order
#18
Sep 02, 2026
MINUTE ORDER issued by the Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 9/2/2026: The court has reviewed Petitioner's 17 Motion for Reconsideration. Respondents shall file an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to the 17 Motion by 12:00 PM on 9/8/2026. Respondents shall attach: (1) a transcript or audio recording of Petitioner's bond hearing, (2) a copy of the Immigration Judge's order, and (3) evidence of the advance notice Petitioner was provided about the time and date of the hearing. Petitioner may file a Reply by 9/22/2026. This matter is not set for a hearing, though the court may schedule one if it determines it is necessary. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS) (Entered: 09/02/2026)
Sep 02, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: Minute Order, filed at Doc. No. 18, served on Mariano Gallardo Flores. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS)
Sep 02, 2026
Minute Order AND ~Util - Set Motion and F&R Deadlines/Hearings
Sep 02, 2026
Service by Mail
#19
Sep 08, 2026
OPPOSITION by Warden, California City Detention Facility to 17 Motion for Reconsideration. (Attachments: # 1 IJ Decision Denying Bond, # 2 Removal Order)(Disparte, Quinn) (Entered: 09/08/2026)
Main Document:
Opposition to Motion
#20
Sep 08, 2026
DIGITAL AUDIO RECORDING of Bond Hearing DAR Part 1 filed by Warden, California City Detention Facility re 19 . Date & Time Time unavailable, Duration Time unavailable. File size [0.9 MB]. (Disparte, Quinn) (Entered: 09/08/2026)
Main Document:
DIGITAL
#21
Sep 08, 2026
DIGITAL AUDIO RECORDING of Bond Hearing DAR Part 2 filed by Warden, California City Detention Facility re 19 . Date & Time Time unavailable, Duration Time unavailable. File size [9.5 MB]. (Disparte, Quinn) (Entered: 09/08/2026)
Main Document:
DIGITAL
#22
Sep 08, 2026
APPENDIX by Warden, California City Detention Facility re 19 Opposition to Motion filed by Warden, California City Detention Facility. (Disparte, Quinn) (Entered: 09/08/2026)
Main Document:
APPENDIX
#23
Sep 08, 2026
SUPPLEMENT by Mariano Gallardo Flores re 17 Motion for Reconsideration. (Deputy Clerk AJB) (Entered: 09/10/2026)
Main Document:
SUPPLEMENT
#24
Sep 08, 2026
MOTION to ENFORCE JUDGMENT by Mariano Gallardo Flores. (Deputy Clerk AJB) (Entered: 09/11/2026)
Main Document:
Enforce Judgment
#25
Sep 18, 2026
MINUTE ORDER issued by Relief Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 9/18/2026: In Petitioner's 17 Motion for Reconsideration, Petitioner argues that he is entitled to habeas relief separate and apart from that provided to him in this court's 14 Order because (1) this motion "challenges Petitioner's present and continuing detention in light of the extraordinary length of detention and circumstances that continue to exist and have become increasingly significant"; and (2) Petitioner has begun experiencing medical issues that are not being adequately treated in immigration detention. In the court's 14 Order granting his habeas petition, however, the court ordered that Petitioner be provided a bond hearing to address the prolonged nature of his continuing detention. In their 19 Opposition, Respondents confirm that Petitioner was provided such a bond hearing and that the immigration judge applied the standard required by this court. On 9/8/2026 Petitioner filed a 23 Supplement and a 24 Motion to Enforce Judgment, which the court construes as a reply in support of his 17 Motion, in which he states that the bond hearing was deficient but does not detail with specificity any procedural defects in the hearing. To the extent Petitioner argues that the evidence considered by the immigration judge was insufficient to meet the government's burden, that argument is properly raised to the Board of Immigration Appeals, not this court. Loba L.M. v. Andrews, No. 1:25-cv-00611-JLT-SAB, 2026 WL 710307, at *8 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2026) ("Petitioner challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the immigration judge's bond determination rather than the constitutionality of the process by which that determination was reached... Complaints about the conclusion the IJ reached must be presented through the normal immigration appeal process."). As to Petitioner's arguments relating to his medical care, such challenges to the conditions of confinement are not cognizable in habeas actions under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. See Pinson v. Carvajal, 69 F.4th 1072 (9th Cir. 2023); see also Arauco Mendoza v. Chestnut et al., 1:26-cv-00627-KES-SAB, Doc. No. 9 (Feb. 5, 2026) (denying motion for a temporary restraining other where the petitioner sought "immediate release based on her assertion that she has received constitutionally-deficient medical care while in civil immigration detention"). Accordingly, Petitioner's 17 Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED and Petitioner's 24 Motion to Enforce Judgment is DENIED as having been rendered moot by this Order. This case shall remain closed. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk MCF) (Entered: 09/18/2026)
Sep 18, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 25 Minute Order served on Mariano Gallardo Flores. (Deputy Clerk MCF)
Sep 18, 2026
Minute Order AND Order on Motion for Reconsideration AND Order on Motion to Enforce Judgment
Sep 18, 2026
Service by Mail
#26
Oct 02, 2026
Reopen Case
Main Document:
Reopen Case
Oct 06, 2026
Minute Order AND Order on Motion to Reopen Case AND ~Util - 1 Terminate Deadlines and Hearings
Oct 06, 2026
Service by Mail
Parties
(HC) Gallardo Flores
Party
Warden California City Detention Facility
Party