Completed
Case Information
Filed: April 08, 2026
Assigned to:
Jason K Pulliam
Referred to:
—
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Completed: July 16, 2026
Last Activity:
July 20, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Apr 08, 2026
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 10928), filed by Edilio Evelio Robledo-Temaj. (Attachments: # 1 Cover Sheet, # 2 Envelope, # 3 Receipt)(r013) (Entered: 04/13/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Apr 08, 2026
Case Opening Letter sent to Edilio Evelio Robledo-Temaj. (bc) (Entered: 04/13/2026)
Main Document:
Case Opening Letter
#3
Apr 08, 2026
PRO SE MOTION to Enforce 28 U.S.C. 2243 and for Prompt Adjudication of Habeas Petition by Edilio Evelio Robledo-Temaj. (bc) (Entered: 04/13/2026)
Main Document:
Miscellaneous Relief
#4
Apr 08, 2026
PRO SE MOTION to Preserve Jurisdiction, for Protection Against Transfer, and for Stay of Removal by Edilio Evelio Robledo-Temaj. (bc) (Entered: 04/13/2026)
Main Document:
Miscellaneous Relief
Apr 08, 2026
THIS CASE HAS BEEN RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JASON K. PULLIAM (bc)
Apr 08, 2026
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Chestney (bc)
Apr 13, 2026
To be Referred to SA Mag Judge
Apr 13, 2026
Remark (No Doc#)
#5
Apr 22, 2026
Order
Main Document:
Order
#6
Apr 22, 2026
Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief AND Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
Main Document:
Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief AND Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
#7
Apr 29, 2026
Response
Main Document:
Response
#8
May 27, 2026
Response
Main Document:
Response
#9
Jul 09, 2026
Order
Main Document:
Order
#10
Jul 13, 2026
Order
Main Document:
Order
#11
Jul 16, 2026
TEXT ORDER GRANTING 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. Petitioner claims that Respondents have violated procedural due process rights under the Fifth Amendment based on a significant presence in the United States and/or an improper revocation of release. Respondents have submitted a response in opposition. After reviewing the briefing, provided evidence, and applicable law, the Court grants the petition based on the law as set out and analyzed in Longoria Mendoza v. Noem, 823 F. Supp. 3d 636 (W.D. Tex. 2026) and numerous other cases decided by the undersigned. While there are differences between this case and Longoria Mendoza, none warrant a different result. For reasons previously stated in Longoria Mendoza, the Court finds that (1) it has jurisdiction to consider the arguments presented in the instant habeas petition; (2) any asserted failure to exhaust administrative remedies is excused; (3) Respondents have violated Petitioner's procedural due process rights; and (4) fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 are not available in habeas corpus proceedings like this one. The Court treats the instant action solely as a habeas action under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and declines to consider any claim other than the alleged violation of procedural due process. The Court has considered the arguments Respondents make in response and rejects them for reasons stated in prior cases. Under the facts and circumstances of this case, this Court concludes Petitioner's detention is unlawful, and habeas relief is proper. Although Petitioner was arrested June 2025 for driving without a license, the disposition of that charge is unknown, and Respondents do not rely on this charge to support his detention or oppose the habeas petition. Because Petitioner has no other known criminal history, has established a significant presence in the United States that requires due process protection, and there is no indication of flight risk or danger to the community, it is ORDERED that on or before July 18, 2026, Respondents shall RELEASE Petitioner Edilio Evelio Robledo-Temaj from custody to a public location, under appropriate conditions of release. Respondents must NOTIFY Petitioner's counsel of the exact location and exact time of release as soon as practicable and no less than two hours before release. Any possible or anticipated removal or transfer of Petitioner under this present detention is PROHIBITED. No later than the next business day after the ordered release date, Respondents shall FILE a status report to confirm whether Petitioner has been released. If counsel for Petitioner disagrees with any aspect of the filed Status Report, counsel may file a separate Status Report. A written final judgment will be issued separately to summarize the orders of the Court and to close this habeas case. Signed by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (rw) (lc) (Entered: 07/16/2026)
#12
Jul 16, 2026
Judgment
Main Document:
Judgment
Jul 16, 2026
Order
#13
Jul 20, 2026
Status Report
Main Document:
Status Report
Parties
Garland
Party
Robledo-Temaj
Party