Central District of California • 2:26-cv-03837

#1

Apr 10, 2026

PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody (28 USC 2241), Receipt No. BCACDC-41968056 for $5 filing fee, filed by Petitioner Azurin Roman Ocampo. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Alfonso Morales added to party Azurin Roman Ocampo(pty:pet))(Morales, Alfonso) (Entered: 04/10/2026)

#2

Apr 10, 2026

The Petitioner acknowledges the availability of a Magistrate Judge but declines to consent to have a Magistrate Judge conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and entry of judgment. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (et) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 04/10/2026)

#3

Apr 10, 2026

NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Dolly M. Gee and referred to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (et) (Entered: 04/10/2026)

#4

Apr 10, 2026

Notice of General Order 26-05 and Briefing Schedule. (et) (Entered: 04/10/2026)

Apr 10, 2026

2241 Initial Case Assignment Consent or Declination

#5

Apr 13, 2026

Clerical Error (G-11)

#6

Apr 13, 2026

Notice of Reference to US Magistrate Judge (CV-84) (Habeas) - optional html form

#7

Apr 14, 2026

SCHEDULING NOTICE TEXT ONLY ENTRY (In Chambers) by Magistrate Judge Brianna Fuller Mircheff. The Petition in this case indicates that venue is proper in the Southern District of California because Petitioner is detained in the Imperial Regional Detention Facility (Pet. at 1, 3); it was filed, however, in the Central District of California. The Petition also references an order of this Court that this Court did not enter. (Pet. at 2.) It is unclear if Petitioner meant to file this Petition in another District, or if Petitioner's counsel has, perhaps, stated allegations that mixes the facts of one petitioner with another. Moreover, as this Court already ordered the relief "Azurin Roman Ocampo" seeks in claim one, it is unclear what more the Petitioner is asking this Court to do, or whether he is seeking to enforce the judgment entered in the previous case. Petitioner is therefore ordered to show cause in writing why the Petition should not be transferred and/or dismissed, and if it intends to proceed in this District, facts concerning Respondents' compliance with the Court's prior order. Petitioner's response to the OSC should be filed NO LATER THAN APRIL 17, 2026. The GO 26-05 scheduling order is STAYED until further order of this Court, except that Respondents shall promptly enter a notice of appearance, which is already overdue. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ch) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 04/14/2026)

#8

Apr 14, 2026

Response

Apr 14, 2026

Text Only Scheduling Notice

#9

Apr 15, 2026

Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123)

#10

Apr 17, 2026

Transferring Case