Active
Case Information
Filed: April 09, 2026
Assigned to:
Sheri Polster Chappell
Referred to:
Douglas N. Frazier
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Active
Last Activity:
April 24, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Apr 09, 2026
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - Federal (Filing fee $ 5 receipt number AFLMDC-24753014) filed by Edgar Tzoy De La Cruz. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit A - Passport, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit B - ICE Locator, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit C - Asylum Receipt, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit D - Birth Certificate)(Texidor, Christina) (Entered: 04/09/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Apr 10, 2026
NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Sheri Polster Chappell and Magistrate Judge Douglas N. Frazier. New case number: 2:26-cv-01103-SPC-DNF. (JOS) (Entered: 04/10/2026)
Apr 10, 2026
Case Assigned/Reassigned
#3
Apr 13, 2026
Order to Respond to Habeas Petition
Main Document:
Order to Respond to Habeas Petition
#4
Apr 17, 2026
Notice of appearance
Main Document:
Notice of appearance
#5
Apr 20, 2026
Dismiss
Main Document:
Dismiss
#6
Apr 20, 2026
Response to habeas petition
Main Document:
Response to habeas petition
#7
Apr 20, 2026
ENDORSED ORDER denying Respondent Warden Matthew Mordant's Motion to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 5). "The federal habeas statute straightforwardly provides that the proper respondent to a habeas petition is the person who has custody over the petitioner." Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 434 (2004) (cleaned up). While courts have recognized that immigration detainees in state-run facilities can bring habeas claims against certain federal officials, see, e.g., Masingene v. Martin, 424 F. Supp. 3d 1298, 1301 (S.D. Fla. 2020), the immediate custodian is also a proper respondent. As the immediate custodian of the petitioner, the Warden is a proper respondent to his habeas petition. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 4/20/2026. (SAP) (Entered: 04/20/2026)
#8
Apr 20, 2026
Reply to response to petition
Main Document:
Reply to response to petition
Apr 20, 2026
Order on Motion to Dismiss
#10
Apr 24, 2026
Judgment
Main Document:
Judgment
Parties
Party
Party
Party
Party
Party
Party
Attorney
Attorney
Attorney
Firm
Firm