District of Oregon • 6:25-cv-02014

#1

Oct 30, 2025

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241- Federal) Filing Fee in amount of $5 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-10045120. Tess Margaret Hellgren,Tess Margaret Hellgren,Tess Margaret Hellgren,Tess Margaret Hellgren,Stephen W. Manning,Jordan Elizabeth Cunnings for C-C-S-,Tess Margaret Hellgren,Stephen W. Manning,Jordan Elizabeth Cunnings for A-B-D-. Filed by C-C-S-, A-B-D- against Kristi Noem, Cammilla Wamsley, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Pamela Bondi, Todd Lyons, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Hellgren, Tess) (Entered: 10/30/2025)

#2

Oct 30, 2025

ORDER. Signed on 10/30/2025 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ck) (Entered: 10/30/2025)

#3

Oct 30, 2025

Notice Petitioners' Status Pursuant to Court Order ECF 2 Filed by All Defendants. (Luse, Susanne) (Entered: 10/30/2025)

#4

Oct 30, 2025

Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Ann L. Aiken. (le) (Entered: 10/30/2025)

#5

Oct 30, 2025

Proposed Summons (Cammilla Wamsley) (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Summons Pamela Bondi, # 2 Proposed Summons DHS, # 3 Proposed Summons ICE, # 4 Proposed Summons Todd Lyons, # 5 Proposed Summons Kristi Noem) Filed by A-B-D-, C-C-S-. (Hellgren, Tess) (Entered: 10/30/2025)

#6

Nov 03, 2025

Extension of Time to Answer a Complaint/Petition

#7

Nov 03, 2025

ORDER: Granting Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer 6 . Answer is due by 11/10/2025. Ordered by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ck) (Entered: 11/03/2025)

Nov 03, 2025

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer a Complaint/Petition

#8

Nov 04, 2025

Summons Issued

#9

Nov 06, 2025

Proposed Summons

#10

Nov 07, 2025

Summons Issued

#11

Nov 10, 2025

Response

#12

Nov 10, 2025

Declaration

#13

Nov 10, 2025

File Document Under Seal

#14

Nov 12, 2025

SCHEDULING ORDER: The Court is in receipt of the Response to the habeas petition 11 . The Court finds good cause to extend the habeas deadlines to allow Petitioners to submit a Reply in support of their Petition. Petitioners shall have until 11/26/2025 to file a Reply brief in support of their Petition. Upon receipt of the Reply brief the Court will assess whether a hearing will be necessary to resolve the Petition. Ordered by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ck) (Entered: 11/12/2025)

Nov 12, 2025

1 - Scheduling

#16

Nov 13, 2025

0seal - Seal Docket Entry and/or Document ONLY use with other selection AND Exhibit

#17

Nov 21, 2025

Attorney Appearance

#18

Nov 26, 2025

Reply

#19

Nov 26, 2025

Declaration

#20

Nov 26, 2025

Declaration

#21

Nov 26, 2025

Declaration

#22

Dec 05, 2025

ORDER: Respondents are directed to file a brief notice on the record setting forth the precise statutory basis for Petitioners A.B.D. and C.C.S.'s prior detention at the Northwest Ice Processing Center in Tacoma, Washington on October 31, 2025. This notice shall be filed by 5:00PM on December 5, 2025. Ordered by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ck) (Entered: 12/05/2025)

#23

Dec 05, 2025

Declaration

#24

Dec 05, 2025

Notice

#25

Dec 05, 2025

ORDER: Petitioners A.B.D's and C.C.S.'s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is GRANTED, ECF No. 1 . The Court is in receipt of Respondents' Notice of Statutory Basis for Petitioners' Detention, ECF No. 24, which provides that Petitioners are detained under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2). Respondents do not have authority to detain Petitioners under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2). Although Petitioners were released from detention at the Northwest ICE Processing Center in Tacoma, Washington, on October 31, 2025, ICE placed Petitioners in ankle monitors and requires A.B.D. to attend mandatory ICE check-ins. Petitioners are thus still in Respondents' custody. Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241(c)(3), federal courts have authority to grant writs of habeas corpus to individuals "in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States." 28 U.S.C. § 2241(c)(3). Custody is not limited to physical imprisonment. A court may afford habeas relief to an individual, who, as here, is subject to "restraints not shared by the public generally." Jones v. Cunningham, 371 U.S. 236, 240 (1963); see also Munoz v. Smith, 17 F.4th 1237, 1241 (9th Cir. 2021) (holding that custody "encompass[es] circumstances in which the state has imposed 'significant restraints on [a] petitioner's liberty'") (quoting Jones, 371 U.S. at 373). Ankle monitors and mandatory check-ins are not restraints shared by the public generally. They impose significant restraints on A.B.D.'s and C.C.S.'s liberty. Respondents must immediately release Petitioners from ankle monitors and required check-ins and may not re-detain Petitioners. Respondents must provide the Court proof of Petitioners' release from ankle monitors and required check-ins within twenty-four hours of this Order. Ordered by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ck) (Entered: 12/05/2025)

Dec 05, 2025

Order

#26

Jan 22, 2026

Opinion and Order

#27

Jan 22, 2026

Withdrawal of Attorney