Western District of Tennessee • 2:26-cv-02396

CASANOVA VIDAL v. MINTER

Active

Case Information

Filed: April 08, 2026
Assigned to: Brian C. Lea
Referred to: Tu M. Pham
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Active
Last Activity: April 08, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
Apr 08, 2026
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ATNWDC-4934971), filed by JOSE ROBERTO CASANOVA VIDAL. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit, # 4 Exhibit, # 5 Exhibit, # 6 Exhibit, # 7 Exhibit, # 8 Exhibit, # 9 Exhibit, # 10 Exhibit, # 11 Exhibit, # 12 Exhibit, # 13 Civil Cover Sheet, # 14 Exhibit, # 15 Exhibit, # 16 Exhibit, # 17 Exhibit, # 18 Exhibit, # 19 Exhibit, # 20 Memorandum)(Noyes, Ralph) (Entered: 04/08/2026)
Main Document: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Apr 08, 2026
District Judge Brian C Lea and Chief Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham added. (dc) (Entered: 04/08/2026)
Main Document: Add and Terminate Judges
#3
Apr 08, 2026
NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (dc) (Entered: 04/08/2026)
#4
Apr 08, 2026
NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (dc) (Entered: 04/08/2026)
#5
Apr 08, 2026
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form (form AO 85) is available on the US Courts website at https://www.uscourts.gov/forms-rules/forms. (dc) (Entered: 04/08/2026)
Apr 08, 2026
Notice LR 16.2
Apr 08, 2026
Notice LR 72.1 - Right to Consent to Jurisdiction by Magistrate Judge
Apr 08, 2026
ADR Compliance

Parties

CASANOVA VIDAL
Party
MINTER
Party