Central District of California • 5:26-cv-01708
Roberto Ramos Cifuentes v. Markwayne Mullin
Active
Case Information
Filed: April 08, 2026
Assigned to:
Stephanie S. Christensen
Referred to:
—
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Active
Last Activity:
April 08, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Apr 08, 2026
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody (28 USC 2241), Receipt No. ACACDC-41941298 for $5 filing fee, filed by PETITIONER ROBERTO RAMOS CIFUENTES. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Supplement) (Attorney Carlos R Barrios added to party ROBERTO RAMOS CIFUENTES(pty:pet))(Barrios, Carlos) (Entered: 04/08/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Attorney Civil Case Opening)
#2
Apr 08, 2026
First PETITION for Temporary Restraining Order as to WRIT OF HABEAS filed by PETITIONER ROBERTO RAMOS CIFUENTES. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration) (Barrios, Carlos) (Entered: 04/08/2026)
Main Document:
Temporary Restraining Order
#3
Apr 08, 2026
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to Magistrate Judge Stephanie S. Christensen. (et) (Entered: 04/08/2026)
Main Document:
Notice of Assignment to U.S. Magistrate Judge CV-25B optional html form
#4
Apr 08, 2026
Notice of General Order 26-05 and Briefing Schedule. (et) (Entered: 04/08/2026)
Main Document:
Notice (Scheduling Order 2241) - optional html form
#5
Apr 08, 2026
(IN CHAMBERS) Order Denying Petitioner's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (ECF 2) by Magistrate Judge Stephanie S. Christensen denying 2 MOTION for TRO. The Court denies Petitioners motion for a TRO because the briefing schedule on Petitioner's underlying habeas petition has been expedited and Respondent has been ordered to provide at least two court days' notice of its intent to remove Petitioner from this judicial district such that Petitioner cannot show irreparable harm warranting a TRO during the pendency of his habeas proceedings. See Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Bhd. of Teamsters, 415 U.S. 423, 439 (1974) (the underlying purpose of a TRO is "preserving the status quo and preventing irreparable harm just so long as is necessary to hold a hearing.") Accordingly, Petitioners motion for a TRO (ECF 2) is DENIED. (tsn) (Entered: 04/08/2026)
Main Document:
Temporary Restraining Order
Parties
Markwayne Mullin
Party
Roberto Ramos Cifuentes
Party