Eastern District of California • 2:26-cv-01393

(HC) Reyes v. Warden of the Golden State Detention Facility

Active

Case Information

Filed: April 07, 2026
Assigned to: Dena M. Coggins
Referred to: Carolyn K. Delaney
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 8:1105(a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Active
Last Activity: April 30, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
Apr 07, 2026
PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Warden of the Golden State Detention Facility by Carlos Soto Reyes. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Deputy Clerk KEZ) (Entered: 04/07/2026)
Main Document: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Apr 07, 2026
MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Carlos Soto Reyes. (Deputy Clerk KEZ) (Entered: 04/07/2026)
Main Document: Temporary Restraining Order
#3
Apr 07, 2026
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 5/11/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Litigant Letter) (Deputy Clerk KEZ) (Entered: 04/07/2026)
Main Document: Prisoner New Case Documents for DJ Presider
Apr 07, 2026
RECEIPT number 200018255 for $5.00 from California Legal Express. (Deputy Clerk KEZ)
Apr 07, 2026
Service by Mail
Apr 07, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 3 Prisoner New Case Documents served on Carlos Soto Reyes. (Deputy Clerk KEZ)
#4
Apr 08, 2026
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 04/08/2026)
Main Document: CONSENT/DECLINE
#5
Apr 08, 2026
MINUTE ORDER issued by the Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 4/8/2026: The court has reviewed Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 2 Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order. In that Motion, Petitioner states he was detained on 7/21/2025, over eight months before filing that Motion. Petitioner does not explain why he did not seek injunctive relief sooner. Notably, Local Rule 231(b) states: "In considering a motion for a temporary restraining order, the Court will consider whether the applicant could have sought relief by motion for preliminary injunction at an earlier date without the necessity for seeking last-minute relief by motion for temporary restraining order." Because Petitioner's 2 Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order is untimely, the court will CONVERT that Motion to a 2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Further, the court has previously addressed the legal issues raised by Count One of the Petition. See, e.g., Hoac v. Becerra, No. 2:25-cv-01740-DC-JDP, 2025 WL 1993771 (E.D. Cal. July 16, 2025), Vuong v. Becerra, 1:25-cv-01847-DC-CSK, 2025 WL 3707172 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2025), and El-Ghazaly v. Chestnut, 1:25-cv-01621-DC-CKD, 2025 WL 3485030 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 4, 2025). The court is contemplating ruling directly on the Petition, with the understanding that the court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the Motion for a Preliminary Injunction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); A.R. v. Chestnut, No. 1:26-cv-00551-KES-SAB, 2026 WL 227112, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2026) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). Respondents shall file an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to the 2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction by 12:00PM on 4/13/2026. In their response, Respondents shall substantively address whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that materially distinguish it from the court's prior orders listed above. Petitioner may file a Reply by 4/27/2026. Both parties should address whether they oppose the court ruling directly on the Petition, albeit as to Count One only, to the extent a ruling on that Count entitles Petitioner to the relief sought in the Petition. The matter is not set for a hearing though the court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS) (Entered: 04/08/2026)
#6
Apr 08, 2026
DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Eric Grant, GOVT for Warden of the Golden State Detention Facility (Grant, Eric) (Entered: 04/08/2026)
Main Document: DESIGNATION
Apr 08, 2026
Minute Order AND ~Util - Set Motion and F&R Deadlines/Hearings
Apr 08, 2026
Service by Mail
Apr 08, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: Minute Order, filed at Doc. No. 5, served on Carlos Soto Reyes. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS)
#7
Apr 13, 2026
Opposition to Motion
Main Document: Opposition to Motion
Apr 30, 2026
Minute Order AND Order on Motion for TRO AND ~Util - 1 Terminate Deadlines and Hearings
Apr 30, 2026
Service by Mail

Parties

(HC) Reyes
Party
Warden of the Golden State Detention Facility
Party