District of Nevada • 2:26-cv-01057

#1

Apr 06, 2026

MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Elmer Rene Ramirez-Anaya.. (Attachments: # 1 Petition WHC, # 2 Motion appoint Counsel)(WJ) (Entered: 04/07/2026)

#2

Apr 07, 2026

NOTICE from USDC advising case against Bondi, et al., has been received and assigned case number 2:26-cv-01057-GMN-EJY. (WJ) (Entered: 04/07/2026)

#3

Apr 07, 2026

TRANSFER ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED the Clerk of Court is kindly instructed to transfer Case No. 2:26-cv-01057-GMN-EJY to Judge Richard F. Boulware, II. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Clerk of Court is instructed to administratively RELATE this matter to Case No. 2:25-cv-02136-RFB-MDC. All further documents must bear the correct case number 2:26-cv-01057-GMN-EJY. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro and Judge Richard F. Boulware on 4/7/2026. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ALZ) (Entered: 04/07/2026)

#4

Apr 07, 2026

ORDER Granting 1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Petitioner's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. 1 -2) is GRANTED. The Federal Public Defender for the District of Nevada ("FPD") is HEREBY APPOINTED to represent Petitioner and is directed to file a notice of appearance by April 9, 2026. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Petitioner, with the assistance of counsel, must file an amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus by April 21, 2026. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court will send a copy of this Order to the FPD and the CJA coordinator for this division. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that on or before April 10, 2026, Federal Respondents must PRODUCE the following documents to Petitioner's Counsel: See order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondents shall not remove Petitioner from this judicial district, absent leave of this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is kindly instructed to: 1. ADD the United States Attorney for the District of Nevada to the docket as an Interested Party. 2. SEND, through CM/ECF, a copy of the Petition (ECF No. 1 -1) and this Order to Counsel for Respondent John Mattos at ahesman@strucklove.com. 3. MAIL a copy of the Petition (ECF No. 1 -1) and this Order pursuant to Rule 4(i)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to Respondent John Mattos at Nevada Southern Detention Center, 2190 E. Mesquite Ave., Pahrump, NV 89060. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 4/7/2026. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CJA/JM - ALZ) (Entered: 04/07/2026)

Apr 07, 2026

Case randomly assigned to District Judge Gloria M. Navarro and Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah. Nature of Suit: 463 - Habeas Immigration (WJ)

Apr 07, 2026

Assign Judges in Civil Case

#5

Apr 09, 2026

Notice Appearance of Counsel

#6

Apr 14, 2026

Notice Appearance of Counsel

#7

Apr 21, 2026

Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus Amended

#8

Apr 21, 2026

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 4/21/2026. The Court is in receipt of Petitioner's 7 First Amended Petition. The Court has reviewed the Petition and preliminarily finds Petitioner can likely demonstrate that he is a member of the certified class ("Class Member") in Jacobo-Ramirez v. Mullin, No. 25-cv-02136-RFB-MDC (D. Nev.) and entitled to relief pursuant to the Court's classwide declaratory judgment and vacatur. See Jacobo Ramirez v. Mullin, No. 2:25-cv-02136-RFB-MDC, 2026 LX 175584 (D. Nev. Mar. 30, 2026).Therefore, Respondents are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why Petitioner is NOT a Class Member AND why the Writ should not be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 2243. Respondents shall file, in writing, a (i) notice of appearance and (ii) "a return certifying the true cause of detention" on or before April 24, 2026. See id. Petitioner may file a traverse on or before April 28, 2026.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Parties shall indicate in their briefing whether they request oral argument or an evidentiary hearing on the Petition. The Court is amenable to ruling on the papers if the Parties indicate that they are willing to waive a hearing. Unless Respondents contend Petitioner is not a Class Member, Respondents should not reargue their statutory interpretation under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2)(A). That statutory issue has been fully litigated by Federal Respondents and finally resolved by the Court in its classwide judgment. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CMB) (Entered: 04/21/2026)

Apr 21, 2026

Minute Order

#9

Apr 24, 2026

Response

#10

Apr 24, 2026

Notice Appearance of Counsel

#11

Apr 24, 2026

Response

#12

Apr 28, 2026

Traverse

#13

May 05, 2026

Response

#14

May 15, 2026

Order

#15

May 15, 2026

Judgment

#16

May 18, 2026

Status Report