District of Colorado • 1:26-cv-01438

#1

Apr 06, 2026

Emergency APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241 (Filing fee $ 5, Receipt Number ACODC-10926792)Attorney Mehmet Yigit Turkoglu added to party Giyos Uktam Ugli Bakhriddinov(pty:pet), filed by Giyos Uktam Ugli Bakhriddinov. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Parole Document, # 2 Exhibit Work Authorization Notice, # 3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Turkoglu, Mehmet) (Entered: 04/06/2026)

#2

Apr 06, 2026

Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. Text Only Entry. (agarc, ) (Entered: 04/06/2026)

#3

Apr 06, 2026

Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (agarc, ) (Entered: 04/06/2026)

#4

Apr 06, 2026

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on April 6, 2026. Upon review of Petitioner's 1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus (the "Petition"), which requests, inter alia, that the court grant the Petition, "[a]ssume jurisdiction over this matter," "[o]rder that Respondents not transfer the Petitioner outside of this District during the pendency of this Petition," and "[o]rder the Petitioners immediate release from custody," it is ORDERED that Petitioner shall serve Respondents with a copy of the 1 Petition, and accompanying papers, along with a copy of this Order, by e-mail and overnight mail, on or before April 8, 2026. Petitioner shall promptly file proof of such service on the docket, and counsel for Respondents shall promptly enter their notices of appearance. Within seven days of service, Respondents shall RESPOND to the 1 Petition and SHOW CAUSE why the Petition shall not be granted. In doing so, Respondents are asked to briefly address whether the issues presented here are materially different from the issues this court has resolved in its prior rulings in Merchan-Pacheo v. Noem, No. 25-cv-3860-SBP, 2026 WL 88526 (D. Colo. Jan. 12, 2026) and/or Arenas v. Noem, No. 26-cv-24-SBP, 2026 WL 317562 (D. Colo. Feb. 5, 2026). It is further ORDERED that the parties shall file a completed Magistrate Judge consent form (ECF No. 3 ) on or before April 13, 2026. Respondents are hereby enjoined from transferring Petitioner outside of the jurisdiction of the District of Colorado pending resolution of the 1 Petition. Text Only Entry (sbplc6, ) (Entered: 04/06/2026)

Apr 06, 2026

Order

#5

Apr 13, 2026

NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Winnie Wu on behalf of Juan Baltazar, Robert Hagan, Todd Lyons, Markwayne MullinAttorney Winnie Wu added to party Juan Baltazar(pty:res), Attorney Winnie Wu added to party Robert Hagan(pty:res), Attorney Winnie Wu added to party Todd Lyons(pty:res), Attorney Winnie Wu added to party Markwayne Mullin(pty:res) (Wu, Winnie) (Entered: 04/13/2026)

#6

Apr 13, 2026

CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Respondents Juan Baltazar, Robert Hagan, Todd Lyons, Markwayne Mullin All parties consent.. (Wu, Winnie) (Entered: 04/13/2026)

#7

Apr 16, 2026

ORDER OF REFERENCE. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73, Local Civil Rules 40.1(c)(6) and 72.2, and 6 Election Concerning Consent/Non-Consent to United States Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction, this action is REFERRED for final disposition to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose, who will conduct any and all further proceedings and order the entry of judgment in the case. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 4/16/2026. Text Only Entry (dddlc1, ) (Entered: 04/16/2026)

Apr 16, 2026

Order on Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge

#8

Apr 20, 2026

ANSWER to Complaint by Juan Baltazar, Robert Hagan, Todd Lyons, Markwayne Mullin. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - US Brief in Mendoza Gutierrez)(Wu, Winnie) (Entered: 04/20/2026)

#9

Apr 20, 2026

REPLY to 8 Answer to Complaint, 4 Order,,,,,, by Petitioner Giyos Uktam Ugli Bakhriddinov. (Turkoglu, Mehmet) (Entered: 04/20/2026)

#10

May 08, 2026

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on May 8, 2026. The 1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus (the "Petition") is GRANTED. The Court notes that Respondents concede that the central legal issue presented here--whether Petitioner is subject to mandatory detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2) or is instead entitled to a bond hearing under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a)--is not materially different from an issue this Court resolved in a prior ruling in Merchan-Pacheo v. Noem, No. 25-cv-3860-SBP, 2026 WL 88526 (D. Colo. Jan. 12, 2026). See also, e.g., Arenas v. Noem, No. 26-cv-24-SBP, 2026 WL 317562 (D. Colo. Feb. 5, 2026). Respondents acknowledge that this Court's prior rulings would lead the Court to reach the same result here, presuming the Court adheres to the analysis articulated in, e.g., Merchan-Pacheo. Respondents have cited no source of law binding upon this Court that would require reconsideration of those rulings. Accordingly, the Court refers the parties to its analyses in both Arenas, 2026 WL 317562, and Merchan-Pacheo, 2026 WL 88526, finding that the analyses provided in these cases apply in this matter and that accordingly, Petitioner is entitled to a bond hearing. The Court therefore GRANTS Petitioner's Petition and orders Respondents to provide Petitioner with an individualized bond hearing pursuant to Section 1226(a) no later than seven days from the date of this Order. Respondents are also ordered to file a status report in order to certify compliance within ten days of issuance of this Order. If Petitioner has not been provided with such a bond hearing at the time this status report is due, Petitioner shall be immediately released. Text Only Entry (sbplc9, ) (Entered: 05/08/2026)

May 08, 2026

Order