Northern District of Illinois • 1:25-cv-13183

#1

Oct 29, 2025

PETITION for writ of habeas corpus filed by Gilberto Miranda Alarcon against All Defendants Filing fee $ 5, receipt number AILNDC-24270996. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kola, Isuf) (Entered: 10/29/2025)

#2

Oct 29, 2025

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Gilberto Miranda Alarcon by Isuf Kola (Kola, Isuf) (Entered: 10/29/2025)

#3

Oct 29, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings: Petitioner has filed a 28 U.S.C. §2241 habeas corpus petition challenging his detention in ICE custody 1 . Respondents are ordered to respond to the habeas corpus petition by 11/5/25. The Court directs Respondents to review the Court's opinion in Patel v. Crowley, No. 25 C 11180, 2025 WL 2996787 (N.D.Ill. Oct. 24, 2025) before filing any response. In their response, Respondents shall state: (1) whether, as he alleges, Petitioner was located in the Northern District of Illinois at the time this case was filed; (2) the current status of Petitioner's immigration proceedings; (3) Petitioner's current location and the proper Respondent based on that location; and (4) the Government's view as to the impact (if any) that the decision in Castanon Nava v. DHS, No. 18 C 3757, 2025 WL 2842146 (N.D.Ill Oct. 20, 2025), has on Petitioner's habeas corpus case. Pursuant to the Court's authority under the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. §1651, the Government is ordered not to remove Petitioner from the jurisdiction of the United States and not to transfer him to any federal judicial district other than those in the States of Illinois, Indiana, or Wisconsin. A.A.R.P. v. Trump, 145 S. Ct. 1364, 1369 (2025) (citing 28 U.S.C. §1651(a)) ("[T]he Government represented on the record in federal court that it reserved the right to remove detainees after midnight. We had the power to issue injunctive relief to prevent irreparable harm to the applicants and to preserve our jurisdiction over the matter."); United States v. United Mine Workers of Am., 330 U.S. 258, 293 (1947) ("The District Court had the power to preserve existing conditions while it was determining its own authority to grant injunctive relief."). If the Petitioner is already, as of the posting of this order, located outside of Illinois, Indiana, or Wisconsin but within the United States, or is in the midst of transportation outside of those States to another State, then this bar on transfer does not require the immediate return of the Petitioner as long as Respondents intend to hold Petitioner within the United States. Instead, the parties and the Court will address the issue after Respondents make their preliminary filing. The Clerk shall email a copy of this order to Tom Walsh, Chief of the Civil Division, United States Attorney's Office, Northern District of Illinois, Craig Oswald, AUSA, United States Attorney's Office, Northern District of Illinois, and Joshua Press, AUSA, United States Attorney's Office, Northern District of Illinois. Status hearing set for 11/7/25 at 11:30 a.m. Mailed notice (cc, ) (Entered: 10/29/2025)

Oct 29, 2025

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Heather K. McShain. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (cvk, )

Oct 29, 2025

EMAILED a copy of the Court's 10/29/25 Order 3 to Tom Walsh, Chief of the Civil Division, United States Attorney's Office, Northern District of Illinois, Craig Oswald, AUSA, United States Attorney's Office, Northern District of Illinois, and Joshua Press, AUSA, United States Attorney's Office, Northern District of Illinois. (cc, )

Oct 29, 2025

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (cvk, )

#4

Oct 30, 2025

Order

#9

Nov 07, 2025

1 - Terminate Deadlines and Hearings AND Order AND Order on Motion for Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus AND ~Util - Set Deadlines/Hearings