District of Colorado • 1:26-cv-01433

#1

Apr 02, 2026

APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC § 2241, filed by Phong Chu So. (Attachments: # 1 Letter)(angar, ) (Entered: 04/06/2026)

#2

Apr 02, 2026

Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley for Initial Review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1 (b). Text Only Entry. (angar, ) (Entered: 04/06/2026)

#3

Apr 06, 2026

Order

#4

Apr 08, 2026

SUPPLEMENT/AMENDMENT AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §2241 by Petitioner Phong Chu So. (Attachments: # 1 Entry of appearance, # 2 Proposed Order (PDF Only) Order to show cause, # 3 Exhibit Vietnam Reparations, # 4 Exhibit 90 day review, # 5 Exhibit re release MOU, # 6 Exhibit Automated Case info Deport, # 7 Exhibit Calculated dates, # 8 Exhibit Date calculator)(Dixon, Claire) (Entered: 04/08/2026)

#5

Apr 09, 2026

SUPPLEMENT/AMENDMENT Civil Cover sheet by Petitioner Phong Chu So. (Dixon, Claire) (Entered: 04/09/2026)

#6

Apr 09, 2026

Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number 117624 (anewt,) (Entered: 04/09/2026)

#7

Apr 10, 2026

Order Reassigning Case AND ~Util - Set/Clear Flags

#8

Apr 10, 2026

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE.The petitioner must serve the respondents with 4 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. The petitioner need not serve a summons with a copy of the petition. The petitioner must promptly file proof of service in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(l)(1).Having reviewed the petition, I find that good cause appears, and it is therefore ORDERED that the respondents must SHOW CAUSE within three weeks after service of the petition why the application for a writ of habeas corpus should not be granted. The petitioner may file a reply within two weeks of service of the response(s).SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 4/10/2026. Text Only Entry (dddlc1, ) (Entered: 04/10/2026)

#9

Apr 10, 2026

ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 4/10/2026. Text Only Entry (dddlc1, ) (Entered: 04/10/2026)

Apr 10, 2026

Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge

Apr 10, 2026

Order to Show Cause