Western District of Kentucky • 3:26-cv-00235
Bracamonte-Paredes v. Tindall
Active
Case Information
Filed: April 02, 2026
Assigned to:
Benjamin Beaton
Referred to:
—
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Active
Last Activity:
June 30, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Apr 02, 2026
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief filed by Jose Gregorio Bracamonte-Paredes (Filing fee $5, receipt number AKYWDC-4485351) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A ICE Detainee Locator Printout, # 2 Exhibit B Oldham County Detention Center Printout) (DLW) (Entered: 04/02/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Apr 02, 2026
Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Benjamin Beaton. (DLW) (Entered: 04/02/2026)
Main Document:
Case Assignment
#3
Apr 02, 2026
NOTICE of Appearance by Katherine A. Bell on behalf of Pamela Jo Bondi, Field Office Director, Todd M. Lyons, Markwayne Mullin (Bell, Katherine) (Entered: 04/02/2026)
Main Document:
Notice of Appearance
Apr 02, 2026
REMARK: Electronic notification of the petition and any subsequent order constitutes valid service on all federal respondents named therein as of the date of this remark pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding and Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, which the Court is applying to these cases. (DLW)
Apr 02, 2026
Remark (Public)
#4
Jun 02, 2026
TEXT ORDER: In response to the petition for a writ of habeas corpus (DN 1 ), the Court directs the Respondents to show cause, no later than 6/6/26, why the writ should not be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 2243. On first review, the petition appears to be controlled by the Court of Appeals' decision in Lopez-Campos v. Raycraft, 2026 WL 1283891 (6th Cir. May 11, 2026). Unless the parties file notice that they seek a hearing, the Court will presume that the petition presents no material factual disputes and decide it on the papers. To the extent the Government contends that the Petitioner was granted humanitarian parole under § 1182(d)(5)(A) or that an IJ has already found that the Petitioner was a flight risk or a threat to the public, it must include those facts and arguments in its response to this order. The Clerk of Court shall forward by certified mail, return receipt requested, one copy of the petition and this order on each Respondent who has not been designated by the United States Attorney's Office, as agreed to by the Attorney's Office and the Clerk in the 1/20/26 Memorandum of Understanding, to receive electronic notice and service. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc: Counsel, Respondents (as directed) (HMC) (Entered: 06/02/2026)
#5
Jun 02, 2026
Notice (Other)
Main Document:
Notice (Other)
Jun 02, 2026
Order - TEXT ONLY
#6
Jun 05, 2026
Response AND Response to Order to Show Cause
Main Document:
Response AND Response to Order to Show Cause
#7
Jun 08, 2026
TEXT ORDER: In response to the Court's show-cause order, the Government agreed that Lopez-Campos v. Raycraft, 2026 WL 1283891 (6th Cir. May 11, 2026), resolves the pending habeas petition. Accordingly, the Court directs the Government to either release the Petitioner or provide a bond hearing within 5 days and promptly update this Court on the outcome of any hearing, the status of the Petitioner, and any new or additional facts relevant to these proceedings. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc: Counsel (HMC) (Entered: 06/08/2026)
#8
Jun 08, 2026
Notice (Other)
Main Document:
Notice (Other)
Jun 08, 2026
Order - TEXT ONLY
#9
Jun 11, 2026
Status Report
Main Document:
Status Report
Jun 30, 2026
Order Dismissing Case
Parties
Bracamonte-Paredes
Party
Tindall
Party