Eastern District of California • 2:26-cv-01276

#1

Apr 02, 2026

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Warden by Omar Luis Henriquez Rebolledo. (Deputy Clerk VLC) (Entered: 04/02/2026)

#2

Apr 02, 2026

MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Omar Luis Henriquez Rebolledo. (Deputy Clerk VLC) (Entered: 04/02/2026)

#3

Apr 02, 2026

PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 5/7/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Litigant Letter) (Deputy Clerk VLC) (Entered: 04/02/2026)

#4

Apr 02, 2026

CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 04/02/2026)

#5

Apr 02, 2026

MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) issued by Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/2/2026: Pending the issuance of the court's order resolving the pending 2 motion for temporary restraining order, and unless and until the court orders otherwise, the court ORDERS that respondent shall not take any action to remove petitioner from the United States or to move petitioner out of the Eastern District of California. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (acknowledging the court's express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction). Given the exigent circumstances present, the court finds that this order is warranted to maintain the status quo pending its forthcoming order resolving petitioner's pending 2 motion for temporary restraining order. A review of the docket reveals that counsel for respondent has already appeared and filed unrelated documents in this case. Accordingly, respondent shall file a written opposition to the pending 2 motion for temporary restraining order by tomorrow, 4/3/2026, at 5:00 PM. In that opposition, respondent shall substantively address whether any provision of law or fact in this case would distinguish it from this court's decision in Ayala Cajina v. Wofford, No. 1:25-cv-01566-DAD-AC (HC), 2025 WL 3251083 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 21, 2025), and other similar cases previously decided by this court, or otherwise indicate that the matter is not substantively distinguishable. Furthermore, respondent is DIRECTED to indicate in its opposition whether it opposes converting the motion for temporary restraining order into a motion for preliminary injunction and whether it opposes the court resolving the merits of the underlying habeas petition. If the parties were to jointly agree upon a less demanding briefing schedule, the court will consider the parties' proposal. (Deputy Clerk PAB) (Entered: 04/02/2026)

Apr 02, 2026

Minute Order

Apr 02, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 5 Minute Order served on Omar Luis Henriquez Rebolledo. (Deputy Clerk PAB)

Apr 02, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 3 Prisoner New Case Documents served on Omar Luis Henriquez Rebolledo. (Deputy Clerk VLC)

Apr 02, 2026

Service by Mail

#6

Apr 03, 2026

MOTION to DISMISS by Warden. (Bocchini, Walter) (Entered: 04/03/2026)

#7

Apr 03, 2026

CERTIFICATE / PROOF of SERVICE by Warden re 6 MOTION to DISMISS. (Bocchini, Walter) (Entered: 04/03/2026)

#8

Apr 03, 2026

Order AND Order on Motion for TRO AND Order on Motion to Dismiss AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case

#9

Apr 03, 2026

Judgment

Apr 03, 2026

Service by Mail