Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-02469

#1

Mar 31, 2026

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against All Respondents by Roger Oswaldo Banegas Raudales. (Deputy Clerk OML) (Entered: 03/31/2026)

#2

Mar 31, 2026

MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Roger Oswaldo Banegas Raudales. (Deputy Clerk OML) (Entered: 03/31/2026)

#3

Mar 31, 2026

MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Roger Oswaldo Banegas Raudales. (Deputy Clerk OML) (Entered: 03/31/2026)

#4

Mar 31, 2026

MOTION for APPOINTMENT of COUNSEL by Roger Oswaldo Banegas Raudales. (Deputy Clerk OML) (Entered: 03/31/2026)

#5

Mar 31, 2026

PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 5/4/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Litigant Letter) (Deputy Clerk OML) (Entered: 03/31/2026)

#6

Mar 31, 2026

MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/31/2026: Pending the issuance of the court's order resolving the pending 2 motion for temporary restraining order, and unless and until the court orders otherwise, the court ORDERS that respondent shall not take any action to remove petitioner from the United States or to move petitioner out of the Eastern District of California. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (acknowledging the court's express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction). Given the exigent circumstances present, the court finds that this order is warranted to maintain the status quo pending its forthcoming order resolving petitioner's pending 2 motion for temporary restraining order. In light of petitioner's pro se status, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to serve respondent with a copy of the petition, motion for temporary restraining order, and accompanying papers, along with this order, to the United States Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of California by email at usacae.ecf2241-imm@usdoj.gov. Counsel for respondent shall promptly enter Notices of Appearance. Respondent shall file a written opposition to the pending 2 motion for temporary restraining order by 5:00 PM Thursday, 4/2/2026. In that opposition, respondent shall substantively address whether any provision of law or fact in this case would distinguish it from this court's decision in Rocha Chavarria v. Chestnut, No. 1:25-cv-01755-DAD-AC, 2025 WL 3533606 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2025), Singh v. Albarran, No. 1:25-cv-01821-DAD-SCR, 2025 WL 3640678 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 16, 2025), and other similar cases previously decided by this court, or otherwise indicate that the matter is not substantively distinguishable. Furthermore, respondent is DIRECTED to indicate in its opposition whether it opposes converting the motion for temporary restraining order into a motion for preliminary injunction and whether it opposes the court resolving the merits of the underlying habeas petition. If the parties were to jointly agree upon a less demanding briefing schedule, the court will consider the parties' proposal. (Deputy Clerk PAB) (Entered: 03/31/2026)

Mar 31, 2026

Minute Order

Mar 31, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 5 Prisoner New Case Documents served on Roger Oswaldo Banegas Raudales. (Deputy Clerk OML)

Mar 31, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 6 Minute Order served on Roger Oswaldo Banegas Raudales. (Deputy Clerk PAB)

Mar 31, 2026

Service by Mail

#7

Apr 01, 2026

CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 04/01/2026)

#9

Apr 02, 2026

Certificate / Proof of Service