Eastern District of California • 2:26-cv-01217

#1

Mar 31, 2026

2241 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against all Respondents by Brayan Stiven Martinez Cardona. (Deputy Clerk LMS) (Entered: 03/31/2026)

#2

Mar 31, 2026

EX PARTE APPLICATION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Brayan Stiven Martinez Cardona. (Deputy Clerk LMS) (Entered: 03/31/2026)

#3

Mar 31, 2026

PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 5/4/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Litigant Letter) (Deputy Clerk LMS) (Entered: 03/31/2026)

#4

Mar 31, 2026

MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 3/31/2026: The court has reviewed Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. The court has previously addressed the legal issues raised by Count One of the Petition. See, e.g., Hoac v. Becerra, No. 2:25-cv-01740-DC-JDP, 2025 WL 1993771 (E.D. Cal. July 16, 2025), Vuong v. Becerra, 1:25-cv-01847-DC-CSK, 2025 WL 3707172 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2025), and El-Ghazaly v. Chestnut, 1:25-cv-01621-DC-CKD, 2025 WL 3485030 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 4, 2025). The court is contemplating ruling directly on the 1 Petition, with the understanding that the court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); A.R. v. Chestnut, No. 1:26-cv-00551-KES-SAB, 2026 WL 227112, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2026) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). Respondents shall file an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to the 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by 12:00 PM on 4/3/2026. In their response, Respondents shall substantively address whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that materially distinguish it from the court's prior orders listed above. Petitioner may file a Reply by 4/16/2026. Both parties should address whether they oppose the court ruling directly on the Petition, albeit as to Count One only, to the extent a ruling on that Count entitles Petitioner to the relief sought in the Petition. The matter is not set for a hearing though the court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk JRW) (Entered: 03/31/2026)

#5

Mar 31, 2026

CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 03/31/2026)

Mar 31, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 3 Prisoner New Case Documents served on Brayan Stiven Martinez Cardona. (Deputy Clerk LMS)

Mar 31, 2026

RECEIPT number 200018064 for $5.00 for Brayan Stiven Martinez Cardona. (Deputy Clerk LMS)

Mar 31, 2026

Service by Mail

Mar 31, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 4 Minute Order served on Brayan Stiven Martinez Cardona. (Deputy Clerk JRW)

Mar 31, 2026

Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings

#6

Apr 03, 2026

RESPONSE by Pamela Jo Bondi, Todd M. Lyons, Kristi Noem to 4 Minute Order,,,,,,,,, Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings,,,,,,,, 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. (Attachments: # 1 Ex.1 Order of the Immigration Judge, # 2 Ex. 2: EADM Printout, # 3 Ex. 3 Notice to Appear)(Ahmed, Ihsan) (Entered: 04/03/2026)

#7

Apr 03, 2026

Dismiss

#8

Apr 03, 2026

MINUTE ORDER issued by Relief Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 4/3/2026: Having reviewed Respondents' 6 response, in which they clarify that Petitioner does not have a final order of removal, he was released from detention on parole on December 16, 2022, and he was re-detained by immigration officials on March 2, 2026, the court hereby directs Respondents to file a supplemental response to substantively address whether any provision of law or fact in this case would distinguish it from this court's decisions in Selis Tinoco v. Noem, 1:25-cv-01762-DC-JDP, 2025 WL 3567862 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2025), Labrador-Prato v. Noem, 1:25-cv-01598-DC-SCR, 2025 WL 3458802 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2025), and D.L.C. v. Wofford, 1:25-cv-01996-DC-JDP, 2026 WL 25511 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2026), or indicate that the matter is not substantively distinguishable. Respondents shall file their supplemental response by 12:00 PM on 4/6/2026. Respondents shall also address whether they oppose the court ruling directly on the Petition, albeit as to Count One only, to the extent a ruling on that Count entitles Petitioner to the relief sought in the Petition. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk RAA) (Entered: 04/03/2026)

Apr 03, 2026

Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings

Apr 03, 2026

Service by Mail

Apr 03, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 8 Minute Order served on Brayan Stiven Martinez Cardona. (Deputy Clerk RAA)

#9

Apr 05, 2026

RESPONSE by Pamela Jo Bondi, Todd M. Lyons, Kristi Noem to 8 Minute Order,,,,, Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings,,,,. (Ahmed, Ihsan) (Entered: 04/05/2026)

#10

Apr 07, 2026

Order AND Order on Motion for TRO AND Order on Motion to Dismiss AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case

#11

Apr 07, 2026

Judgment

Apr 07, 2026

Service by Mail